ArticleJMIR mental health2018
Using Neural Networks with Routine Health Records to Identify Suicide Risk: Feasibility Study.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction models for self-harm and suicide: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms and their predictive accuracy for suicide and self-harm: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Role of machine learning algorithms in suicide risk prediction: a systematic review-meta analysis of clinical studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Pooled it
- The use of machine learning on administrative and survey data to predict suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence in the prediction and prevention of suicide.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2026Review
- Development and validation of the suicide risk score: a novel suicide risk prediction tool for patients with end-stage kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- A cohort study of predictors of short-term nonfatal suicidal and self-harm events among individuals with mental health disorders treated in the emergency department.Journal of psychiatric research · 2025Article
- Use of Data Linkage Methods to Investigate Healthcare Interactions in Individuals Who Self-harm and Die by Suicide: A Scoping Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Article
- Automatically extracting social determinants of health for suicide: a narrative literature review.Npj mental health research · 2024Review
- Factors associated with suicidal attempts in female patients with mood disorder.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Identifying long-term and imminent suicide predictors in a general population and a clinical sample with machine learning.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Incidence, Mortality and Survival in Young People with Co-Occurring Mental Disorders and Substance Use: A Retrospective Linked Routine Data Study in Wales.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Meta-analysis of the strength of exploratory suicide prediction models; from clinicians to computers.BJPsych open · 2021Article
- Identification of Suicidal Ideation in theFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Contacts with primary and secondary healthcare prior to suicide: case-control whole-population-based study using person-level linked routine data in Wales, UK, 2000-2017.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2020Article
- Accurate Diagnosis of Suicide Ideation/Behavior Using Robust Ensemble Machine Learning: A University Student Population in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Suicide Risk Assessment Using Machine Learning and Social Networks: a Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEach year, approximately 800,000 people die by suicide worldwide, accounting for 1-2 in every 100 deaths. It is always a tragic event with a huge impact on family, friends, the community and health professionals. Unfortunately, suicide prevention and the development of risk assessment tools have been hindered by the complexity of the underlying mechanisms and the dynamic nature of a person's motivation and intent. Many of those who die by suicide had contact with health services in the preceding year but identifying those most at risk remains a challenge.
objectiveTo explore the feasibility of using artificial neural networks with routinely collected electronic health records to support the identification of those at high risk of suicide when in contact with health services.
methodsUsing the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank UK, we extracted the data of those who died by suicide between 2001 and 2015 and paired controls. Looking at primary (general practice) and secondary (hospital admissions) electronic health records, we built a binary feature vector coding the presence of risk factors at different times prior to death. Risk factors included: general practice contact and hospital admission; diagnosis of mental health issues; injury and poisoning; substance misuse; maltreatment; sleep disorders; and the prescription of opiates and psychotropics. Basic artificial neural networks were trained to differentiate between the suicide cases and paired controls. We interpreted the output score as the estimated suicide risk. System performance was assessed with 10x10-fold repeated cross-validation, and its behavior was studied by representing the distribution of estimated risk across the cases and controls, and the distribution of factors across estimated risks.
resultsWe extracted a total of 2604 suicide cases and 20 paired controls per case. Our best system attained a mean error rate of 26.78% (SD 1.46; 64.57% of sensitivity and 81.86% of specificity). While the distribution of controls was concentrated around estimated risks < 0.5, cases were almost uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. Prescription of psychotropics, depression and anxiety, and self-harm increased the estimated risk by ~0.4. At least 95% of those presenting these factors were identified as suicide cases.
conclusionsDespite the simplicity of the implemented system, the proposed methodology obtained an accuracy like other published methods based on specialized questionnaire generated data. Most of the errors came from the heterogeneity of patterns shown by suicide cases, some of which were identical to those of the paired controls. Prescription of psychotropics, depression and anxiety, and self-harm were strongly linked with higher estimated risk scores, followed by hospital admission and long-term drug and alcohol misuse. Other risk factors like sleep disorders and maltreatment had more complex effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.