ReviewSeminars in radiation oncology2018
The Practicality of ICRU and Considerations for Future ICRU Definitions.
Review in Seminars in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical implementation and patient-specific quality assurance solutions for real-time target tracking and dynamic delivery in Radixact synchrony.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- The existence of cranial bone flap displacement during brain radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of 6D couch with daily cone beam computed tomography in reducing PTV margins for glioblastoma multiforme.Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) volumes are standardized volume definitions used in radiation oncology practice that have evolved over time to account for advancements in technology and radiation planning. The current definitions have strengths but also practical limitations. The main limitation is related to the process of accounting for tumor motion during treatment. As radiotherapeutic techniques become more precise, motion interplay effects and anatomical changes during treatment must be taken into account to ensure accurate and safe delivery of treatment. Adaptive replanning can help to mitigate the effect of these uncertainties and widen the therapeutic ratio by maximizing dose to the tumor and protecting critical normal structures. As adaptive replanning becomes more common, standardization of how adaptive therapy is implemented and reported will become necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.