Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933762›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Not a magic pill: a qualitative exploration of provider perspectives on antibiotic prescribing in the outpatient setting.

Traci D Yates, Marion E Davis, Yhenneko J Taylor, Lisa Davidson, Crystal D Connor, Katherine Buehler, Melanie D Spencer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Next Steps in Ambulatory Stewardship.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  10. Hotline to Helpline: Reducing On-call Demands.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Experiences of antibiotic use among Brazilian healthcare users: An exploratory study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Traci D YatesCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA. Traci.Yates@atriumhealth.org.
Marion E DavisCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Yhenneko J TaylorCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Lisa DavidsonDivision of Infectious Disease, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Crystal D ConnorCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Katherine BuehlerCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Melanie D SpencerCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate prescribing of antibiotics poses an urgent public health threat. Limited research has examined factors associated with antibiotic prescribing practices in outpatient settings. The goals of this study were to explore elements influencing provider decisions to prescribe antibiotics, identify provider recommendations for interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use, and inform the clinical management of patients in the outpatient environment for infections that do not require antibiotics.

methodsThis was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with key informants. Seventeen outpatient providers (10 medical doctors and 7 advanced care practitioners) within a large healthcare system in Charlotte, North Carolina, participated. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes.

resultsPrimary barriers to reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing included patient education and expectations, system-level factors, and time constraints. Providers indicated they would be interested in having system-wide, evidence-based guidelines to inform their prescribing decisions and that they would also be receptive to efforts to improve their awareness of their own prescribing practices. Results further suggested that providers experience a high demand for antibiotic prescriptions; consequently, patient education around appropriate use would be beneficial.

conclusionsFindings suggest that antibiotic prescribing in the outpatient setting is influenced by many pressures, including patient demand and patient satisfaction. Training on appropriate antibiotic prescribing, guideline-based decision support, feedback on prescribing practices, and patient education are recommended interventions to improve levels of appropriate prescribing.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingInappropriate PrescribingAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDecision Support TechniquesEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleNurse PractitionersPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPediatriciansPhysician AssistantsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescribingAntibiotic prescribing decisionsOutpatient settingPatient antibiotic educationPatient-provider relationshipsPrimary careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29933762
PMCPMC6015451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.