ReviewBMC palliative care2018
Advance care planning in dementia: recommendations for healthcare professionals.
Review in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04912245 (A Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention in Those With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Unrecognized Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Telehealth Advance Care Planning Intervention in Those With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Unrecognized Dementia (Tele Voice)
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical dilemmas in the care of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias unable to give informed consent: positioning Lebanon within the Global North-South context.BMC medical ethics · 2025Pooled it
- Publicly Available, Interactive Web-Based Tools to Support Advance Care Planning: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of home healthcare on end-of-life outcomes for people with dementia: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2022Pooled it
- A Cross-Sectional Study on Healthcare Providers' Perceived Compassion and Emotional Exhaustion Across Five Acute Geriatric Units: The Importance of Mutual Respect and Open Reflection.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Documented follow-up to memory concerns reported at the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Bringing up the end of life and euthanasia. A mixed method study on consultations with people with dementia and their families in the hospital setting.Palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Quality of end-of-life care among individuals with and without dementia: a Swedish registry-based study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Factors in Patient-Clinician Interactions That Influence the Decision-Making Process of Older Patients with Dementia.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Palliative care conversations with people with dementia who live alone: untapped dimensions from a lived experience.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Advance care planning in German nursing homes from the perspective of the facilitators: A focus group study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives on dementia policy implementation in Macao: progress, challenges and future directions.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Proxy, nurse, and physician needs regarding advance care planning by proxy for aged care residents lacking decision making capacity: an exploratory study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Impact of the DEDICATED approach to optimizing palliative care for people with dementia: a multi-method study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Views of Family Caregivers on Advance Care Planning in Advanced Dementia Care in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Thematic Content Analysis Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- An evaluation of a multidisciplinary care planning tool for people with intellectual disabilities and behaviours of concern.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2025Article
- Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Article
- "You like to be in control of your own destiny to a degree, don't you?": conscientious autonomy and planning for future care with dementia.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Proactive end-of-life conversations in residential care homes: a qualitative interview study exploring residents' and family members' experiences.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Palliative use of midazolam in acute geriatric units: a multicenter ambispective study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a continuous, dynamic process of reflection and dialogue between an individual, those close to them and their healthcare professionals, concerning the individual's preferences and values concerning future treatment and care, including end-of-life care. Despite universal recognition of the importance of ACP for people with dementia, who gradually lose their ability to make informed decisions themselves, ACP still only happens infrequently, and evidence-based recommendations on when and how to perform this complex process are lacking. We aimed to develop evidence-based clinical recommendations to guide professionals across settings in the practical application of ACP in dementia care.
methodsFollowing the Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's procedures, we 1) performed an extensive literature search to identify international guidelines, articles reporting heterogeneous study designs and grey literature, 2) developed recommendations based on the available evidence and expert opinion of the author group, and 3) performed a validation process using written feedback from experts, a survey for end users (healthcare professionals across settings), and two peer-review groups (with geriatricians and general practitioners).
resultsBased on 67 publications and validation from ten experts, 51 end users and two peer-review groups (24 participants) we developed 32 recommendations covering eight domains: initiation of ACP, evaluation of mental capacity, holding ACP conversations, the role and importance of those close to the person with dementia, ACP with people who find it difficult or impossible to communicate verbally, documentation of wishes and preferences, including information transfer, end-of-life decision-making, and preconditions for optimal implementation of ACP. Almost all recommendations received a grading representing low to very low-quality evidence.
conclusionNo high-quality guidelines are available for ACP in dementia care. By combining evidence with expert and user opinions, we have defined a unique set of recommendations for ACP in people living with dementia. These recommendations form a valuable tool for educating healthcare professionals on how to perform ACP across settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.