Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933587›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

dB/dt Evaluation in MRI Sites: Is ICNIRP Threshold Limit (for Workers) Exceeded?

Giuseppe Acri, Patrizia Inferrera, Lucia Denaro, Carlo Sansotta, Elisa Ruello, Carmelo Anfuso, Francesca Maria Salmeri, Girolamo Garreffa, Giuseppe Vermiglio, Barbara Testagrossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giuseppe AcriDepartment of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. gacri@unime.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8897-2853
Patrizia InferreraSchool on Medical Physic, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. patrizia.inferrera@gmail.com.
Lucia DenaroDepartment of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. ldenaro@unime.it.
Carlo SansottaDepartment of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. sansotta@unime.it.
Elisa RuelloDepartment of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. eruello@unime.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8905-3736
Carmelo AnfusoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98123 Messina, Italy. carmelo.anfuso@irccsme.it.
Francesca Maria SalmeriDepartment of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. fmsalmeri@unime.it.
Girolamo GarreffaIEMEST (PA), Fondazione Potito (CB), FISMECO (RM), Via G. Donati, 00159 Roma, Italy. g.garreffa@gmail.com.
Giuseppe VermiglioDepartment of P.A.S.S.I., University of Messina, Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. vermigli@unime.it.
Barbara TestagrossaDepartment of BIOMORF, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98168 Messina, Italy. btestagrossa@unime.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Directive 2013/35/EU establishes standards for workers exposed to static and time varying magnetic fields. These limits are based on ICNIRP guidelines expressed in terms of the electric field induced in the body. The complexity of this measurement led to theoretical models being developed. In this study, the experimental evaluation included varying magnetic field exposures for two classes of MRI workers. The measurements are conducted on four different MRI Systems including one 0.35 T, two 1.5 T, and one 3.0 T. Pocket magnetic dosimeters were used and it was carried out during routine conditions, emergency conditions, and cold-head maintenance/substitution. The acquired data has been processed and the corresponding dB/dt curves have been computed as the first time derivative of the dataset. The weighted peak approach was also implemented for the compliance assessment with regulatory limits. The dB/dt peak values have been compared with the reference level (RL) proposed by ICNIRP. The results show that the RL always exceeds during measurements on the 3.0 T scanner and sometimes on 1.5 T. In light of the foregoing, the diffusion of ultra-high field MRI scanners involves the introduction of behavioral rules that could be more useful than a numerical action level.

Indexed as

Body BurdenMedical StaffAdultFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMagnetic FieldsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMaximum Allowable ConcentrationMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureRadiation MonitoringMRI safetyMRI workers exposurestatic magnetic fieldtime-varying magnetic field

Identifiers

PMID29933587
PMCPMC6068997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.