Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933583›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2018

Application of Continuous Culture Methods to Recombinant Protein Production in Microorganisms.

Karl Peebo, Peter Neubauer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Catechol 1,2-Dioxygenase FromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  14. Green Process: Improved Semi-Continuous Fermentation ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Repetitive Fed-Batch: A Promising Process Mode for Biomanufacturing WithFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The LazarusFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karl PeeboCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia. karl@tftak.eu.
Peter NeubauerDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Ackerstraβe 76, ACK24, D-13355 Berlin, Germany. peter.neubauer@tu-berlin.de.
Tallinn University of Technology · EETechnische Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depending on the environmental conditions, cells adapt their metabolism and specific growth rate. Rearrangements occur on many different levels such as macromolecular composition, gene and protein expression, morphology and metabolic flux patterns. As the interplay of these processes also determines the output of a recombinant protein producing system, having control over specific growth rate of the culture is advantageous. Continuous culture methods were developed to grow cells in a constant environment and have been used for decades to study basic microbial physiology in a controlled and reproducible manner. Our review summarizes the uses of continuous cultures in cell physiology studies and process development, with a focus on recombinant protein-producing microorganisms.

Indexed as

chemostatcontinuous culturescontinuous manufacturingrecombinant protein productionspecific growth ratesteady state

Identifiers

PMID29933583
PMCPMC6164559
OpenAlexW2809558679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.