Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933581›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Effects of Sample Preparation on Particle Size Distributions of Different Types of Silica in Suspensions.

Rodrigo R Retamal Marín, Frank Babick, Gottlieb-Georg Lindner, Martin Wiemann, Michael Stintz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effect of the TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel Surfactant-Free Water Dispersion Technique of TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Green Synthesis of Nanomaterials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo R Retamal MarínResearch Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Münchner Platz 3, D-01062 Dresden, Germany. rodrigo.retamal@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-3603
Frank BabickResearch Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Münchner Platz 3, D-01062 Dresden, Germany. frank.babick@tu-dresden.de.
Gottlieb-Georg LindnerEvonik Resource Efficiency GmbH, Brühler Straße 2, 50389 Wesseling, Germany. gottlieb-georg.lindner@evonik.com.
Martin WiemannIBE R&D Institute for Lung Health gGmbH, Mendelstr 11, D-48149 Münster, Germany. martin.wiemann@ibe-ms.de.
Michael StintzResearch Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Münchner Platz 3, D-01062 Dresden, Germany. michael.stintz@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5239-058X
Technische Universität Dresden · DEEvonik (Germany) · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The granulometric characterization of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) nanomaterials (NMs) still demands harmonized standard operation procedures. SAS is produced as either precipitated, fumed (pyrogenic), gel and colloidal SAS and these qualities differ, among others, with respect to their state of aggregation and aggregate strength. The reproducible production of suspensions from SAS, e.g., for biological testing purposes, demands a reasonable amount of dispersing energy. Using materials representative for each of the types of SAS, we employed ultrasonic dispersing (USD) at energy densities of 8⁻1440 J/mL and measured resulting particle sizes by dynamic light scattering and laser diffraction. In this energy range, USD had no significant impact on particle size distributions of colloidal and gel SAS, but clearly decreased the particle size of precipitated and fumed SAS. For high energy densities, we observed a considerable contamination of SAS suspensions with metal particles caused by abrasion of the sonotrode’s tip. To avoid this problem, the energy density was limited to 270 J/mL and remaining coarse particles were removed with size-selective filtration. The ultrasonic dispersion of SAS at medium levels of energy density is suggested as a reasonable compromise to produce SAS suspensions for toxicological in vitro testing.

Indexed as

energy densityin vitro testingnanomaterials (NMs)nanostructuredsample preparationsynthetic amorphous silica (SAS)ultrasonic dispersing (USD)

Identifiers

PMID29933581
PMCPMC6070795
OpenAlexW2809054034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.