ReviewSeminars in speech and language2018
Assessment of Individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia.
Review in Seminars in speech and language, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- Care Partner Perceptions of Conversation Difficulties, Strategy Use, and Psychosocial Impacts in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Descriptive Study Using the PCI-DAT.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Improving the clinical trial landscape for patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease: a call to action.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- FDG-PET in the Evaluation of Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Writing Abilities in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Scoping Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Mixed primary progressive aphasia and alcohol use disorder: a case of detailed clinical phenotyping outperforming molecular imaging.Neurocase · 2026Article
- Evaluating the correspondence of neuropsychological profiles with clinical diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease: insights fromFrontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Face and Content Validation of the 10-Item Communicative Participation Item Bank General Short Form for Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Cognitive Interviewing Study.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Exploring Language Impairment in Catalan-Dominant Bilinguals with Primary Progressive Aphasia: Preliminary Data.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning and temporal response function modeling of EEG data for differential diagnosis in primary progressive aphasia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in the Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders · 2025Article
- Rethinking the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia: current challenges and future directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Language assessment in primary progressive aphasia: Which components should be tested?PloS one · 2025Article
- Applications of the R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework to Support the Process of Assessment in Primary Progressive Aphasia.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Primary progressive aphasia: six questions in search of an answer.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Baseline Conceptual-Semantic Impairment Predicts Longitudinal Treatment Effects for Anomia in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Alzheimer's Disease.Aphasiology · 2024Article
- Role of the Speech-Language Therapist/Pathologist in Primary Progressive Aphasia.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- Executive Profile of the Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia: Comparison with the Semantic and Non-Fluent Variants and Alzheimer's Disease.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Italian translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Progressive Aphasia Severity Scale.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Neuroanatomical correlates of screening for aphasia in NeuroDegeneration (SAND) battery in non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech-language pathologists play a crucial role in the assessment and treatment of individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The speech-language evaluation is a critical aspect of the diagnostic and rehabilitative process, informing differential diagnosis as well as intervention planning and monitoring of cognitive-linguistic status over time. The evaluation should include a thorough case history and interview and a detailed assessment of speech-language and cognitive functions, with tasks designed to detect core and associated deficits outlined in current diagnostic criteria. In this paper, we review assessments that can be utilized to examine communication and cognition in PPA, including general aphasia batteries designed for stroke and/or progressive aphasia as well as tests of specific cognitive-linguistic functions, including naming, object/person knowledge, single-word and sentence comprehension, repetition, spontaneous speech/language production, motor speech, written language, and nonlinguistic cognitive domains. The comprehensive evaluation can inform diagnostic decision making and facilitate planning of interventions that are tailored to the patient's current status and likely progression of deficits. As such, the speech-language evaluation allows the medical team to provide individuals with PPA and their families with appropriate recommendations for the present and the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.