Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Alterations in the gut bacterial microbiome in fungal Keratitis patients.

Sama Kalyana Chakravarthy, Rajagopalaboopathi Jayasudha, Konduri Ranjith, Anirban Dutta, Nishal Kumar Pinna, Sharmila S Mande, Savitri Sharma, Prashant Garg, Somasheila I Murthy, Sisinthy Shivaji

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of gut microbiomes in different ocular pathologies: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Exploring the Ocular Surface Microbiome and Tear Proteome in Glaucoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Gut Microbiota Profiles in Myopes and Nonmyopes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gut microbiota and eye diseases: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Evidence Suggesting the Role of Gut Dysbiosis in Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Nutrients · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sama Kalyana ChakravarthyJhaveri Microbiology Centre, Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.
Rajagopalaboopathi JayasudhaJhaveri Microbiology Centre, Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.
Konduri RanjithJhaveri Microbiology Centre, Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.
Anirban DuttaBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-026X
Nishal Kumar PinnaBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Pune, India.
Sharmila S MandeBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Research, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-1982
Savitri SharmaJhaveri Microbiology Centre, Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.
Prashant GargTej Kohli Cornea Institute, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.
Somasheila I MurthyTej Kohli Cornea Institute, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.
Sisinthy ShivajiJhaveri Microbiology Centre, Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy campus, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-4658
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INTata Consultancy Services (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysbiosis in the gut microbiome has been implicated in several diseases including auto-immune diseases, inflammatory diseases, cancers and mental disorders. Keratitis is an inflammatory disease of the eye significantly contributing to corneal blindness in the developing world. It would be worthwhile to investigate the possibility of dysbiosis in the gut microbiome being associated with Keratitis. Here, we have analyzed fungal and bacterial populations in stool samples through high-throughput sequencing of the ITS2 region for fungi and V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene for bacteria in healthy controls (HC, n = 31) and patients with fungal keratitis (FK, n = 32). Candida albicans (2 OTUs), Aspergillus (1 OTU) and 3 other denovo-OTUs were enriched in FK samples and an unclassified denovo-OTU was enriched in HC samples. However, the overall abundances of these 'discriminatory' OTUs were very low (< 0.001%) and not indicative of significant dysbiosis in the fungal community inhabiting the gut of FK patients. In contrast, the gut bacterial richness and diversity in FK patients was significantly decreased when compared to HC. 52 OTUs were significantly enriched in HC samples whereas only 5 OTUs in FK. The OTUs prominently enriched in HC were identified as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Lachnospira, Mitsuokella multacida, Bacteroides plebeius, Megasphaera and Lachnospiraceae. In FK samples, 5 OTUs affiliated to Bacteroides fragilis, Dorea, Treponema, Fusobacteriaceae, and Acidimicrobiales were significantly higher in abundance. The functional implications are that Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, an anti-inflammatory bacterium and Megasphaera, Mitsuokella multacida and Lachnospira are butyrate producers, which were enriched in HC patients, whereas Treponema and Bacteroides fragilis, which are pathogenic were abundant in FK patients, playing a potential pro-inflammatory role. Heatmap, PCoA plots and functional profiles further confirm the distinct patterns of gut bacterial composition in FK and HC samples. Our study demonstrates dysbiosis in the gut bacterial microbiomes of FK patients compared to HC. Further, based on inferred functions, it appears that dysbiosis in the gut of FK subjects is strongly associated with the disease phenotype with decrease in abundance of beneficial bacteria and increase in abundance of pro-inflammatory and pathogenic bacteria.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFecesFemaleHumansKeratitisMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMycosesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29933394
PMCPMC6014669
OpenAlexW2809393611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.