Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Cranio-morphometric and aDNA corroboration of the Austronesian dispersal model in ancient Island Southeast Asia: Support from Gua Harimau, Indonesia.

Hirofumi Matsumura, Ken-Ichi Shinoda, Truman Shimanjuntak, Adhi Agus Oktaviana, Sofwan Noerwidi, Harry Octavianus Sofian, Dyah Prastiningtyas, Lan Cuong Nguyen, Tsuneo Kakuda, Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hirofumi MatsumuraSchool of Health Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ken-Ichi ShinodaDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Truman ShimanjuntakCenter of Prehistory and Austronesian Studies, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Adhi Agus OktavianaThe National Research Centre of Archaeology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sofwan NoerwidiThe National Research Centre of Archaeology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Harry Octavianus SofianThe National Research Centre of Archaeology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Dyah PrastiningtyasCenter of Prehistory and Austronesian Studies, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Lan Cuong NguyenInstitute of Archaeology, Vietnam Academy of Social Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tsuneo KakudaDepartment of Legal Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan.
Hideaki Kanzawa-KiriyamaDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Noboru AdachiDepartment of Legal Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan.
Hsiao-Chun HungDepartment of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Xuechun FanFujian Museum, Fuzhou, China.
Xiujie WuInstitute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Anna WillisCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Marc F OxenhamSchool of Archeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5804-2145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Austronesian language is spread from Madagascar in the west, Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) in the east (e.g. the Philippines and Indonesian archipelagoes) and throughout the Pacific, as far east as Easter Island. While it seems clear that the remote ancestors of Austronesian speakers originated in Southern China, and migrated to Taiwan with the development of rice farming by c. 5500 BP and onto the northern Philippines by c. 4000 BP (the Austronesian Dispersal Hypothesis or ADH), we know very little about the origins and emergence of Austronesian speakers in the Indonesian Archipelago. Using a combination of cranial morphometric and ancient mtDNA analyses on a new dataset from Gua Hairmau, that spans the pre-Neolithic through to Metal Period (5712-5591cal BP to 1864-1719 cal BP), we rigorously test the validity of the ADH in ISEA. A morphometric analysis of 23 adult male crania, using 16 of Martin's standard measurements, was carried out with results compared to an East and Southeast Asian dataset of 30 sample populations spanning the Late Pleistocene through to Metal Period, in addition to 39 modern samples from East and Southeast Asia, near Oceania and Australia. Further, 20 samples were analyzed for ancient mtDNA and assigned to identified haplogroups. We demonstrate that the archaeological human remains from Gua Harimau cave, Sumatra, Indonesia provide clear evidence for at least two (cranio-morphometrically defined) and perhaps even three (in the context of the ancient mtDNA results) distinct populations from two separate time periods. The results of these analyses provide substantive support for the ADH model in explaining the origins and population history of ISEA peoples.

Indexed as

Human MigrationAnthropometryAsia, SoutheasternDatasets as TopicDNA, AncientDNA, MitochondrialHumansSkullDNA, AncientDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID29933384
PMCPMC6014653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.