Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933057›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2018

Evidence for a shared representation of sequential cues that engage sign-tracking.

Elizabeth B Smedley, Kyle S Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. Complementary Control over Habits and Behavioral Vigor by Phasic Activity in the Dorsolateral Striatum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth B SmedleyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, United States. Electronic address: Elizabeth.B.Smedley.gr@dartmouth.edu.
Kyle S SmithDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, United States.

Funding

Brain Circuit Mechanisms for Reward Cue AttractionR01DA044199 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SMITH, KYLE S · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign-tracking is a phenomenon whereby cues that predict rewards come to acquire their own motivational value (incentive salience) and attract appetitive behavior. Typically, sign-tracking paradigms have used single auditory, visual, or lever cues presented prior to a reward delivery. Yet, real world examples of events often can be predicted by a sequence of cues. We have shown that animals will sign-track to multiple cues presented in temporal sequence, and with time develop a bias in responding toward a reward distal cue over a reward proximal cue. Further, extinction of responding to the reward proximal cue directly decreases responding to the reward distal cue. One possible explanation of this result is that serial cues become representationally linked with one another. Here we provide further support of this by showing that extinction of responding to a reward distal cue directly reduces responding to a reward proximal cue. We suggest that the incentive salience of one cue can influence the incentive salience of the other cue.

Indexed as

CuesMotivationRewardAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorConditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyIncentive salienceMotivationPavlovianRewardSign-trackingValue

Identifiers

PMID29933057
PMCPMC9206823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.