Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29933034›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2018

CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer therapy: Current practice and future opportunities.

Filipa Lynce, Ayesha N Shajahan-Haq, Sandra M Swain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Potent Cell-Cycle Inhibition and Upregulation of Immune Response with Abemaciclib and Anastrozole in neoMONARCH, Phase II Neoadjuvant Study in HRClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Tumor-intrinsic CDC42BPB confers resistance to anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cyclin-dependent kinases: Masters of the eukaryotic universe.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filipa LynceGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Ayesha N Shajahan-HaqGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Sandra M SwainGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA. Electronic address: Sandra.Swain@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Optimizing Targeted Breast Cancer Therapy by Mathematical Modeling and Experimental StudiesR01CA201092 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BAUMANN, WILLIAM THOMAS, SHAJAHAN-HAQ, AYESHA N. · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of the cyclin dependent kinase pathway in luminal breast cancer creates a new therapeutic opportunity for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Initial pan-CDK inhibitors were associated with extensive toxicities but in recent years, the development of potent specific CDK inhibitors with favorable tolerability has driven renewed interests in this class of targeted therapies. Palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib are specific CDK4/6 inhibitors that have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in combination with endocrine therapy for women with advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer. These three anticancer therapeutics were approved based on progression free survival benefit seen on phase III trials with the most common grade 3 treatment-related side effects being neutropenia, fatigue, nausea and diarrhea. Except for estrogen receptor positivity, no biomarkers predictive of response to CDK4/6 inhibitors have been identified to date. Based on mechanistic insights here described, CDK4/6 inhibitors are currently being explored in combination with other agents, including targeted therapies, immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6FemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyridinesabemaciclibAminopyridinesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6palbociclibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyridinesribociclibBreast cancerCDK4CDK6Endocrine resistanceEstrogen receptor

Identifiers

PMID29933034
PMCPMC6533626
OpenAlexW2809032787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.