Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29932615›Full record

ReviewJBRA assisted reproduction2018

Motherhood after breast cancer: can we balance fertility preservation and cancer treatment? A narrative review of the literature.

Márcia M Carneiro, Ana M Cota, Maria C Amaral, Moisa L Pedrosa, Bruna O Martins, Marcelo H Furtado, Rivia M Lamaita, Marcia C F Ferreira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Márcia M CarneiroCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Ana M CotaCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Maria C AmaralCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Moisa L PedrosaCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Bruna O MartinsCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Marcelo H FurtadoCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Rivia M LamaitaCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.
Marcia C F FerreiraCentro de Reprodução Humana Hospital MATER DEI, Belo Horizonte-MG.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer may affect young women who have not yet completed childbearing. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) provides alternatives for fertility preservation such as oocyte, embryo or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. We reviewed the published literature on fertility-preserving management in breast cancer, aiming at finding evidence to answer the following questions: (1) What are the fertility sparing options available?; (2) How do these women respond to IVF? and (3) Can pregnancy influence breast cancer recurrence? There is a paucity of publications describing clinical experience and outcome data which limits accessibility to fertility preservation in this setting. Presently, oocyte or embryo cryopreservation are the main options for fertility preservation. IVF success rates are comparable to the ones of non-oncological populations according to the woman's age but current published studies lack data on definitive success rates following embryo banking for cancer patients. The perception that IVF and pregnancy may worsen cancer prognosis remains, despite the lack of scientific evidence to support this notion. Published studies show reassuring results for pregnancies occurring >2 years after breast cancer diagnosis. The best published evidence suggests pregnancy after breast cancer does not increase the risk of disease recurrence, thus pregnancy should not be forbidden once treatment is completed. Decision making for women diagnosed with cancer requires up-to-date knowledge of the efficacy and safety of available options. Providing consultation with a reproductive specialist and appropriate information on fertility preservation for these women should be an essential aspect of their supportive care.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationBreast NeoplasmsCryopreservationFemaleHumansPregnancyReproductive Techniques, AssistedAssisted reproductive technologies, fertility preservation, breast cancer, in vitro fertilizationpregnancy, embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation

Identifiers

PMID29932615
PMCPMC6106637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.