ReviewPhysiological reports2018
The Neurocircuitry of fluid satiation.
Review in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Central control of gastrointestinal functions in health and disease.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Feeding signals inhibit fluid-satiation signals in the mouse lateral parabrachial nucleus to increase intake of highly palatable, caloric solutions.Journal of neurochemistry · 2023Article
- Neural signalling of gut mechanosensation in ingestive and digestive processes.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Missing pieces in decoding the brain oxytocin puzzle: Functional insights from mouse brain wiring diagrams.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Ticking and talking in the brainstem satiety centre: Circadian timekeeping and interactions in the diet-sensitive clock of the dorsal vagal complex.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Internal States Influence the Representation and Modulation of Food Intake by Subthalamic Neurons.Neuroscience bulletin · 2020Article
- The Neurocircuitry of fluid satiation.Physiological reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid satiation, or quenching of thirst, is a critical homeostatic signal to stop drinking; however, its underlying neurocircuitry is not well characterized. Cutting-edge genetically encoded tools and techniques are now enabling researchers to pinpoint discrete neuronal populations that control fluid satiation, revealing that hindbrain regions, such as the nucleus of the solitary tract, area postrema, and parabrachial nucleus, primarily inhibit fluid intake. By contrast, forebrain regions such as the lamina terminalis, primarily stimulate thirst and fluid intake. One intriguing aspect of fluid satiation is that thirst is quenched tens of minutes before water reaches the circulation, and the amount of water ingested is accurately calibrated to match physiological needs. This suggests that 'preabsorptive' inputs from the oropharyngeal regions, esophagus or upper gastrointestinal tract anticipate the amount of fluid required to restore fluid homeostasis, and provide rapid signals to terminate drinking once this amount has been consumed. It is likely that preabsorptive signals are carried via the vagal nerve to the hindbrain. In this review, we explore our current understanding of the fluid satiation neurocircuitry, its inputs and outputs, and its interconnections within the brain, with a focus on recent studies of the hindbrain, particularly the parabrachial nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.