Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29932494›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reports2018

The Neurocircuitry of fluid satiation.

Philip J Ryan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Neurocircuitry of fluid satiation.Physiological reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip J RyanFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid satiation, or quenching of thirst, is a critical homeostatic signal to stop drinking; however, its underlying neurocircuitry is not well characterized. Cutting-edge genetically encoded tools and techniques are now enabling researchers to pinpoint discrete neuronal populations that control fluid satiation, revealing that hindbrain regions, such as the nucleus of the solitary tract, area postrema, and parabrachial nucleus, primarily inhibit fluid intake. By contrast, forebrain regions such as the lamina terminalis, primarily stimulate thirst and fluid intake. One intriguing aspect of fluid satiation is that thirst is quenched tens of minutes before water reaches the circulation, and the amount of water ingested is accurately calibrated to match physiological needs. This suggests that 'preabsorptive' inputs from the oropharyngeal regions, esophagus or upper gastrointestinal tract anticipate the amount of fluid required to restore fluid homeostasis, and provide rapid signals to terminate drinking once this amount has been consumed. It is likely that preabsorptive signals are carried via the vagal nerve to the hindbrain. In this review, we explore our current understanding of the fluid satiation neurocircuitry, its inputs and outputs, and its interconnections within the brain, with a focus on recent studies of the hindbrain, particularly the parabrachial nucleus.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingDrinkingHomeostasisHumansNeural PathwaysProsencephalonRhombencephalonSatiationThirstArea postremaCalcium imagingDREADDs (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs)Fluid satiationLamina terminalisNeurocircuitryNucleus of the solitary tractOptogeneticsParabrachial nucleusPostabsorptive inputsPreabsorptive inputs

Identifiers

PMID29932494
PMCPMC6014472
OpenAlexW2809582891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.