Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29932453›Full record

ArticleAnnals of human genetics2018

Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes in association studies using allele-based clustering approach for non-normal distributions.

Xiaoyu Liang, Qiuying Sha, Shuanglin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoyu LiangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan.
Qiuying ShaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan.
Shuanglin ZhangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9478-1199

Funding

Statistical Methods for Rare Variant Association StudiesR15HG008209 · NHGRI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI SHA, QIUYING · 2016 to 2016
$437k
NHGRI NIH HHS R15 HG008209NHGRI NIH HHS R15HG008209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the study of complex diseases, several correlated phenotypes are usually measured. There is also increasing evidence showing that testing the association between a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and multiple-dependent phenotypes jointly is often more powerful than analyzing only one phenotype at a time. Therefore, developing statistical methods to test for genetic association with multiple phenotypes has become increasingly important. In this paper, we develop an Allele-based Clustering Approach (ACA) for the joint analysis of multiple non-normal phenotypes in association studies. In ACA, we consider the alleles at a SNP of interest as a dependent variable with two classes, and the correlated phenotypes as predictors to predict the alleles at the SNP of interest. We perform extensive simulation studies to evaluate the performance of ACA and compare the power of ACA with the powers of Adaptive Fisher's Combination test, Trait-based Association Test that uses Extended Simes procedure, Fisher's Combination test, the standard MANOVA, and the joint model of Multiple Phenotypes. Our simulation studies show that the proposed method has correct type I error rates and is much more powerful than other methods for some non-normal distributions.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesComputer SimulationGenetic Association StudiesHumansclustering approachmultiple phenotypesnon-normal distributionnonparametric method

Identifiers

PMID29932453
PMCPMC6188849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.