Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29932308›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Trends in colorectal cancer incidence among younger adults-Disparities by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and subsite.

Amanda B Crosbie, Lisa M Roche, Linda M Johnson, Karen S Pawlish, Lisa E Paddock, Antoinette M Stroup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. History of colonoscopy and technological advances: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda B CrosbieCancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7962-3507
Lisa M RocheCancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Linda M JohnsonCancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Karen S PawlishCancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Lisa E PaddockCancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.
Antoinette M StroupCancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ, USA.

Funding

NEW JERSEY CANCER PREVENTION & CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP003931 · DP · NEW JERSEY STATE DEPT/HEALTH/SENIOR SRVS · PI RODRIQUEZ, GLORIA · 2012 to 2014
$11.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003931NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201300021C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millennials (ages 18-35) are now the largest living generation in the US, making it important to understand and characterize the rising trend of colorectal cancer incidence in this population, as well as other younger generations of Americans. Data from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry (n = 181 909) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (n = 448 714) were used to analyze invasive CRC incidence trends from 1979 to 2014. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, subsite, and stage differences between younger adults (20-49) and screening age adults (≥50) in New Jersey (NJ) were examined using chi-square; and, we compared secular trends in NJ to the United States (US). Whites, men, and the youngest adults (ages 20-39) are experiencing greater APCs in rectal cancer incidence. Rates among younger black adults, overall, were consistently higher in both NJ and the US over time. When compared to older adults, younger adults with CRC in NJ were more likely to be: diagnosed at the late stage, diagnosed with rectal cancer, male, non-white, and Hispanic. Invasive CRC incidence trends among younger adults were found to vary by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and subsite. Large, case-level, studies are needed to understand the role of genetics, human papillomavirus (HPV), and cultural and behavioral factors in the rise of CRC among younger adults. Provider and public education about CRC risk factors will also be important for preventing and reversing the increasing CRC trend in younger adults.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesAdultAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNew JerseyRegistriesSEER ProgramYoung Adultcolorectal cancer incidencecolorectal cancer subsitesdisparitiestime trendsyounger adults

Identifiers

PMID29932308
PMCPMC6089150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.