Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29932123›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Protein-Based Fiber Materials in Medicine: A Review.

Kelsey G DeFrates, Robert Moore, Julia Borgesi, Guowei Lin, Thomas Mulderig, Vince Beachley, Xiao Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tendon Tissue Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Virus-like Particles: Fundamentals and Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelsey G DeFratesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. defratesk6@students.rowan.edu.
Robert MooreDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. moorer1@students.rowan.edu.
Julia BorgesiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. borgesij5@students.rowan.edu.
Guowei LinDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. ling8@students.rowan.edu.
Thomas MulderigDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. mulderigt9@students.rowan.edu.
Vince BeachleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. beachley@rowan.edu.
Xiao HuDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA. hu@rowan.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2579-2820
Rowan University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibrous materials have garnered much interest in the field of biomedical engineering due to their high surface-area-to-volume ratio, porosity, and tunability. Specifically, in the field of tissue engineering, fiber meshes have been used to create biomimetic nanostructures that allow for cell attachment, migration, and proliferation, to promote tissue regeneration and wound healing, as well as controllable drug delivery. In addition to the properties of conventional, synthetic polymer fibers, fibers made from natural polymers, such as proteins, can exhibit enhanced biocompatibility, bioactivity, and biodegradability. Of these proteins, keratin, collagen, silk, elastin, zein, and soy are some the most common used in fiber fabrication. The specific capabilities of these materials have been shown to vary based on their physical properties, as well as their fabrication method. To date, such fabrication methods include electrospinning, wet/dry jet spinning, dry spinning, centrifugal spinning, solution blowing, self-assembly, phase separation, and drawing. This review serves to provide a basic knowledge of these commonly utilized proteins and methods, as well as the fabricated fibers’ applications in biomedical research.

Indexed as

biomaterials fabricationdrug deliverymedicinenanofibersproteintissue engineeringwound healing

Identifiers

PMID29932123
PMCPMC6071022
OpenAlexW2808754728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.