Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29932057›Full record

ReviewJournal of genetics2018

In praise of mealybugs.

Vani Brahmachari, Surbhi Kohli, Parul Gulati

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vani BrahmachariDr. B. R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India. vani.brahmachari@gmail.com.
Surbhi Kohli
Parul Gulati

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fascinating chromosomal cycle leading to facultative heterochromatization in the mealybugs has been a challenging system for mechanistic understanding of the phenomenon of genomic imprinting and epigenetics. The elegant cytological dissection of the various processes reported in the literature is equally fascinating for the researchers of current molecular age. Presently, a two way approach is being pursued; continued efforts of utilizing elegant cytology, in combination with the molecular probes to decipher molecular correlates on one hand and on the other, the

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenomic ImprintingAnimalsDNA MethylationDosage Compensation, GeneticFemaleHemipteraHeterochromatinHumansMaleHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID29932057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.