ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2018
Correction to: Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Axonal pathology differentially affects human Purkinje cell subtypes in the essential tremor cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Heterogeneity in Slow Synaptic Transmission Diversifies Purkinje Cell Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Cerebellar contributions across behavioural timescales: a review from the perspective of cerebro-cerebellar interactions.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023Review
- Cerebellar contribution to threat probability in a SCA6 mouse model.Human molecular genetics · 2022Article
- New Targets and New Technologies in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Eph/ephrin Function Contributes to the Patterning of Spinocerebellar Mossy Fibers Into Parasagittal Zones.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the original version of this paper, the Title should have been written with "A Consensus paper" to read "Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper".
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.