ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018
Update on Incorporating Biomarkers with Imaging Findings for the Detection and Management of Cardiotoxicity.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy and immunotherapy in cancer treatment: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapy and targeted agents.American journal of cancer research · 2021Review
- Use of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes in Preclinical Cancer Drug Cardiotoxicity Testing: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation research · 2019Review
- Biomarkers for the detection of apparent and subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewModern cancer therapy comes at a cost of increased risk of cardiotoxicity. The purpose of our paper is to provide an updated review highlighting research incorporating biomarkers and imaging findings for the detection of subclinical cardiac dysfunction and management of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity. RECENT
findingsBiomarkers, particularly troponin, NTproBNP, and myeloperoxidase, have been shown to have a predictive role in the development of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity. Early reductions in global longitudinal strain and the more recently reported, circumferential strain, have been shown to be predictive of subsequent cardiotoxicity. Integrating troponin levels with longitudinal strain may have incremental value in predicting future cardiotoxicity. Initiating troponin-guided heart failure therapy following cancer treatment may impact the development of cardiotoxicity. Strain-guided heart failure therapy is currently under investigation. Early detection of subclinical cardiac dysfunction in high-risk cancer patients and subsequent medical intervention using biomarkers and imaging may help to alter the course of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity. Current guidelines and expert consensus offer a general framework for monitoring high risk patients for cardiotoxicity. However, additional research is needed to provide a more sophisticated and structured approach in detecting and managing subclinical cardiac dysfunction with hopes of minimizing subsequent cardiotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.