ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2018
Determination of 5-fluorouracil and tegafur in tear fluid of patients treated with oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent, S-1.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular complication induced by anticancer drug S-1: association with drug concentrations in tears.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo establish a method for the measurement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and tegafur (FT) in tear samples from patients treated with oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent S-1. STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
methodsHigh performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method reported for plasma samples was modified for tear samples. Simulated-tear solutions containing lactoferrin, lysozyme and standard solution containing 5-FU or FT were prepared for preliminary measurements. Tear samples from seven patients treated with S-1 were included. The tears were collected following S-1 administration using Schirmer's strips.
results5-FU and FT concentrations of pure standard solution without extraction process were detected as original concentration. However, on extraction, FT samples in simulated-tear solution showed a peak for 5-FU but not for FT. FT was converted to 5-FU in the extraction process. Decomposition from FT to 5-FU was suppressed when 50 mg/mL bovine serum albumin was added during extraction. The mean concentrations of 5-FU and FT in tears during S-1 treatment were 0.17 ± 0.11 and 1.94 ± 0.71 μg/mL, respectively.
conclusionA simple HPLC method to determine 5-FU and FT in tear samples was established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.