Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29931398›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2018

Advances in the Genetics of Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes.

Jennifer N Todd, Shylaja Srinivasan, Toni I Pollin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. From Metabolic Syndrome to Type 2 Diabetes in Youth.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Use of Focus Groups to Inform a New Community-Based Youth Diabetes Prevention Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer N ToddDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shylaja SrinivasanDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Toni I PollinDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Public Health, Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 670 West Baltimore Street, Room 4040, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. tpollin@som.umaryland.edu.
Harvard University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) StudyU01DK061230 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAFFETT, BARBARA HALINA, ZEITLER, PHILIP S. · 2001 to 2019
$231.8M
CAREER DEVELOPMENT IN DIABETES RESEARCH FOR PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINOLOGISTSK12DK094721 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LAFFEL, LORI M, WHITE, MORRIS F. · 2011 to 2021
$6.3M
Training Program in Pediatric EndocrinologyT32DK007161 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian J Feldman, STEPHEN E GITELMAN · 1986 to 2026
$6.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK094721NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007161NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo provide an update on knowledge the role of genetics in youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D). RECENT

findingsThe prevalence in youth of T2D, once thought to be exclusively a disease of adults, has increased by over 35% since 2001. Youth with T2D tend to have higher rates of complications, more aggressive disease, with more rapid loss of beta-cell function and a less favorable response to treatment than adults. Obesity is the most important risk factor for T2D, and the rise in childhood overweight and obesity appears responsible for the dramatic increase in T2D in youth. However, some obese children do not develop T2D, consistent with genetic differences in susceptibility to the disease in the setting of obesity and insulin resistance, currently far less well characterized in youth than in adults. Recent studies have begun to show associations of several established adult T2D genetic risk variants with youth-onset T2D and related glycemic quantitative traits, including the strongest known cross-population T2D genetic contributor TCF7L2. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), a diabetes subtype distinct from type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D, is now known to result from a highly penetrant gene mutation in one of several genes. MODY has been shown to account for or contribute to at least 4.5% of clinically diagnosed T2D, even among those who are overweight or obese, impacting treatment decisions. The recently formed ProDiGY (Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth) Consortium is using genome-wide association studies and whole exome sequencing to understand the genetic architecture of T2D in youth, including how it differs from that of adults. The limited amount of research conducted to date on the genetics of youth-onset T2D, which tends to be a more aggressive disease than adult T2D, suggests some overlap with genes involved in adult T2D and a sizeable influence of highly penetrant monogenic diabetes variants. The ProDiGY Consortium is expected to provide a more comprehensive understanding of youth T2D genetics.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdolescentAge of OnsetDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Genome-Wide Association StudyHumansMutationRisk FactorsGeneticsMonogenic diabetesType 2 diabetesYouth

Identifiers

PMID29931398
PMCPMC6051541
OpenAlexW2809572930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.