Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29931252›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2018

Investigation of viable taxa in the deep terrestrial biosphere suggests high rates of nutrient recycling.

Margarita Lopez-Fernandez, Elias Broman, Stephanie Turner, Xiaofen Wu, Stefan Bertilsson, Mark Dopson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Extremophilic microbial metabolism and radioactive waste disposal.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margarita Lopez-FernandezCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Barlastgatan 11, Kalmar, Sweden.
Elias BromanCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Barlastgatan 11, Kalmar, Sweden.
Stephanie TurnerCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Barlastgatan 11, Kalmar, Sweden.
Xiaofen WuCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Barlastgatan 11, Kalmar, Sweden.
Stefan BertilssonDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Limnology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mark DopsonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS), Linnaeus University, Barlastgatan 11, Kalmar, Sweden.
Linnaeus University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep biosphere is the largest 'bioreactor' on earth, and microbes inhabiting this biome profoundly influence global nutrient and energy cycles. An important question for deep biosphere microbiology is whether or not specific populations are viable. To address this, we used quantitative PCR and high throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing of total and viable cells (i.e. with an intact cellular membrane) from three groundwaters with different ages and chemical constituents. There were no statistically significant differences in 16S rRNA gene abundances and microbial diversity between total and viable communities. This suggests that populations were adapted to prevailing oligotrophic conditions and that non-viable cells are rapidly degraded and recycled into new biomass. With higher concentrations of organic carbon, the modern marine and undefined mixed waters hosted a community with a larger range of predicted growth strategies than the ultra-oligotrophic old saline water. These strategies included fermentative and potentially symbiotic lifestyles by candidate phyla that typically have streamlined genomes. In contrast, the old saline waters had more 16S rRNA gene sequences in previously cultured lineages able to oxidize hydrogen and fix carbon dioxide. This matches the paradigm of a hydrogen and carbon dioxide-fed chemolithoautotrophic deep biosphere.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodiversityBiomassChemoautotrophic GrowthEcosystemGroundwaterNutrientsPhylogenyRecyclingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SNutrientsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29931252
PMCPMC6030916
OpenAlexW2808756465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.