Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29931146›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2019

Ethical challenges in primary care: a focus group study with general practitioners, nurses and informal caregivers.

Ildikó Gágyor, Arndt Heßling, Susanne Heim, Andreas Frewer, Friedemann Nauck, Wolfgang Himmel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ethical Problems and Moral Distress in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ildikó GágyorDepartment of General Practice, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany.
Arndt HeßlingDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
Susanne HeimDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas FrewerInstitute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Friedemann NauckDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Wolfgang HimmelDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs), nurses and informal caregivers are often jointly involved in healthcare situations in which ethical issues play an important role.

objectivesTo describe ethical problems from the perspective of these three groups and to investigate whether there is a common experience of ethical issues in primary care.

methodsWe conducted six focus groups with general practitioners, nurses and informal caregivers in Germany. We asked the participants to describe at least one experience of ethical problem in detail and documented the findings by an illustration software that visualized and structured the discussion. We used thematic analysis to identify ethical problems and to develop categories of ethical issues.

resultsProblems reported barely overlapped. GPs had to do mainly with uncertainty about the scope and limits of their responsibility for patients. Nurses were concerned about bureaucratic and other barriers to professional care and about dual loyalty if they had to consider the conflicting interests of patients and family members. They often felt powerless and unable to act according to their professional standards. Informal caregivers reported problems that resulted from role strain and being both a family member and a caregiver. GPs, nurses and informal caregivers sometimes perceived the other parties as a source of ethical problems.

conclusionsAll parties may benefit from ethics support services, a rarity in German primary care so far. Furthermore, nurses' self-confidence towards GPs, demanding patients and family members has to be strengthened. Informal caregivers, the most vulnerable group, need more attendance and tailored support.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersGermanyHumansMaleNursesPrimary Health CareAttitudes of health personnelcaregiversfocus groupsmedical ethicsprimary carequality of care

Identifiers

PMID29931146
PMCPMC6425460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.