Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29931117›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2018

Foliar application of zinc sulphate and zinc EDTA to wheat leaves: differences in mobility, distribution, and speciation.

Casey L Doolette, Thea L Read, Cui Li, Kirk G Scheckel, Erica Donner, Peter M Kopittke, Jan K Schjoerring, Enzo Lombi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Translocation of Foliar Absorbed Zn in Sunflower (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Casey L DooletteUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Thea L ReadUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Cui LiThe University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Kirk G ScheckelU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Erica DonnerUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Peter M KopittkeThe University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Jan K SchjoerringDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Enzo LombiUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUThe University of Queensland · AUEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foliar application of zinc (Zn) to crops is an effective way to increase the grain concentration of Zn. However, the development of more efficient foliar Zn fertilizers is limited by a lack of knowledge regarding the distribution, mobility, and speciation of Zn in leaves once it is taken up by the plant. We performed an experiment using radiolabelled Zn (65Zn), and in situ time-resolved elemental imaging using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM), to investigate the behaviour of two commonly used Zn foliar fertilizers (Zn sulphate and ZnEDTA) in wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves. Both experiments showed that Zn had limited mobility in leaves, moving <25 mm from the application point after 24 h. Although limited, the translocation of Zn occurred quickly for both treatments; moving more between 3 h and 12 h after application than between 12 h and 24 h. Speciation analysis using synchrotron-based X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) showed that ZnEDTA was in fact taken up in chelated form and not as ionic Zn (Zn2+). The XANES data also showed that Zn, from both treatments, was then complexed by ligands in the leaf (e.g. phytate and citrate), potentially in response to localized Zn toxicity. The results of the present study provide important insights into the behaviour of commonly used foliar-applied Zn fertilizers, and can be used to optimize current fertilization strategies and contribute to the development of more efficient foliar Zn fertilizers.

Indexed as

Biological TransportEdetic AcidEdible GrainFertilizersPlant LeavesTriticumX-Ray Absorption SpectroscopyZincZinc SulfateEdetic AcidFertilizersZincZinc Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID29931117
PMCPMC6093386
OpenAlexW2809374269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.