ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2018
A Bayesian approach to synthesize estimates of the size of hidden populations: the Anchored Multiplier.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexual risk behaviours and population size estimation of men who have sex with men in Bhutan: a cross-sectional survey.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Population size, HIV prevalence, and antiretroviral therapy coverage among key populations in sub-Saharan Africa: collation and synthesis of survey data, 2010-23.The Lancet. Global health · 2024Article
- Triangulating Truth and Reaching Consensus on Population Size, Prevalence, and More: Modeling Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Article
- Mapping and population size estimates of people who inject drugs in Afghanistan in 2019: Synthesis of multiple methods.PloS one · 2022Article
- Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use from drug-related mortality data.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020Article
- Software Application Profile: The Anchored Multiplier calculator-a Bayesian tool to synthesize population size estimates.International journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The multiplier method is one of the most frequently used population size estimation (PSE) methods for key populations, yet estimates from this method are often inconsistent with each other, other PSE methods and local knowledge. We developed a novel Bayesian approach, the 'Anchored Multiplier', which synthesizes estimates from multipliers coupled to an a priori estimate to arrive at a single consensus estimate and credible range. Methods: Data for size estimation were collected from three cross-sectional bio-behavioural surveillance studies of people who inject drugs (PWID) in San Francisco, CA, USA (2005, 2009 and 2012). We demonstrate the application of the Anchored Multiplier and a Variance Adjusted-Anchored Multiplier using PSE produced by multipliers in the three surveys and the literature for the USA. Size estimates were compared with estimates from other available PSE methods. Results: Using the Anchored Multiplier, we estimated the PWID population made up 2.41% [95% credible interval (CI): 1.9-2.85] of the adult population in 2005, 2.1% (95% CI: 1.8-2.48) in 2009 and 2.3% (95% CI: 2.03-2.61) in 2012. The Variance Adjusted-Anchored Multiplier calculated similar point estimates, with wider 95% credible intervals. Credible intervals from both approaches were substantially narrower than from other standard PSE methods and, unlike other methods, indicated that the prevalence of PWID was stable over time. Conclusions: The Anchored Multiplier is a promising new approach to size estimation, which generates a single estimate to inform programmatic strategies to counter the HIV epidemic, and provides a robust denominator to quantify the burden of disease for key populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.