ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2017
Using Heuristic Evaluation to Enhance the Visual Display of a Provider Dashboard for Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Collection of Components to Design Clinical Dashboards Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Development of an electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcome-based shared decision-making dashboard in oncology.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Translating Data Analytics Into Improved Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Roadmap for Biomedical Informatics Research in 2021.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Concordium 2016: Data and Knowledge Transforming Health.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWith the rising use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical practice, there is an increasing need to understand the data visualization needs of clinical teams to support their effective use of PRO data for both individual patient decision making and broader population health applications. A human-centered design (HCD) approach can optimize the visual design of an interactive PRO system. INCLUDING HEURISTIC EVALUATION IN THE HCD TOOLBOX: Recent literature regarding the use of HCD to design and develop PRO visualizations demonstrates the benefits of iterative methods that engage representative users who are likely to use the system in the future. However, the literature has not explored the additive value of other HCD methods such as heuristic evaluation, which involves expert examination of the interface with respect to recognized usability principles, the heuristics. INSIGHTS FROM USING HEURISTIC EVALUATION: Our experience in using heuristic evaluation to enhance the design of a PRO dashboard led to several recommendations to improve the display, accessibility, and interpretability of the dashboard's data. Heuristic evaluation can serve as a complement to HCD methods that directly engage users and thereby enhance usability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.