Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29930872›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2018

A review of the diagnosis and management of vertebral basilar (posterior) circulation disease.

James I Ausman, David S Liebeskind, Nestor Gonzalez, Jeffrey Saver, Neil Martin, J Pablo Villablanca, Paul Vespa, Gary Duckwiler, Reza Jahan, Tianyi Niu and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unusual presentation of basilar artery thrombosis.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James I AusmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nestor GonzalezDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jeffrey SaverDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Neil MartinDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Pablo VillablancaDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Paul VespaDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Gary DuckwilerDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Reza JahanDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tianyi NiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Noriko SalamonDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bryan YooDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Satoshi TateshimaDepartment of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Manuel M Buitrago BlancoDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sidney StarkmanDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have reviewed the English literature published in the last 70 years on Diseases of the Vertebral Basilar Circulation, or Posterior Circulation Disease (PCD). We have found that errors have been made in the conduct and interpretation of these studies that have led to incorrect approaches to the management of PCD. Because of the difficulty in evaluating the PC, the management of PCD has been incorrectly applied from anterior circulation disease (ACD) experience to PCD. PCD is a common form of stroke affecting 20-40% patients with stroke. Yet, the evidence is strong that the Anterior Circulation (AC) and Posterior Circulations (PC) differ in their pathology, in their clinical presentations, in the rapidity of development of symptoms, in optimal imaging methods, and in available treatments. There appears to be two categories of patients who present with PCD. The first, acute basilar artery occlusion has a more rapid onset. The diagnosis must be made quickly and if imaging proves a diagnosis of Basilar Artery Occlusion (BAO), the treatment of choice is Interventional removal of the basilar artery thrombosis or embolus. The second category of PCD and the most commonly seen PCD disease process presents with non-specific symptoms and early warnings of PCD that now can be related to ischemic events in the entire PC vessels. These warning symptoms and signs occur much earlier than those in the AC. IA angiography is still the gold standard of diagnosis and is superior in definition to MR and CT angiography which are commonly used as a convenient screening imaging tool to evaluate PCD but are both inferior to IA angiography in definition for lesions below 3-4 mm. In at least two reported studies 7T MR angiography appears superior to other imaging modalities and will become the gold standard of imaging of PCD in the future. Medical treatments applied to the ACD have not been proven of value in specific forms of PCD. Interventional therapy was promising but of unproven value in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) except for the treatment of Basilar Artery Occlusion (BAO). Surgical revascularization has been proved to be highly successful in patients, who are refractory to medical therapy. These studies have been ignored by the scientific community basically because of an incorrect interpretation of the flawed EC-IC Bypass Trial in 1985 as applying to all stroke patients. Moreover, the EC-IC Bypass Study did not include PCD patients in their study population, but the study results were extrapolated to patients with PCD without any scientific basis. This experience led clinicians to an incorrect bias that surgical treatments are of no value in PCD. Thus, incorrectly, surgical treatments of PCD have not been considered among the therapeutic possibilities for PCD. QMRA is a new quantitative MR technique that measures specific blood flow in extra and intracranial vessels. QMRA has been used to select those patients who may benefit from medical, or interventional, or surgical treatment for PCD based on flow determinations with a high success rate. QMRA accurately predicts the flows in many large and small vessels in the PC and AC and clearly indicates that both circulations are intimately related. From medical and surgical studies, the longer one waits for surgical treatment the higher the risk of a poor outcome results. This observation becomes obvious when the rapidity of development of PCD is compared with ACD. Recent advances in endovascular therapy in the treatment of acute basilar thrombosis is a clear sign that early diagnosis and treatment of PCD will reduce the morbidity and mortality of these diseases. In this review it is evident that there are multiple medical and surgical treatments for PCD depending upon the location of the lesion(s) and the collateral circulation demonstrated. It is clear that the AC and PC have significant differences. With the exception of the large population studies from Oxford England, the reported studies on the management of PCD in the literature represent small selected subsets of the universe of PC diseases, the information from which is not generalizable to the universe of PCD patients. At this point in the history of PCD, there are not large enough databases of similar patients to provide a basis for valid randomized studies, with the exception of the surgical studies. Thus, a high index of suspicion of the early warning symptoms of PCD should lead to a rapid individual clinical assessment of patients selecting those with PCD. Medical, interventional, and/or surgical treatments should be chosen based on knowledge presented in this review. Recording the results in a national Registry on a continuing basis will provide the data that may help advance the management of PCD based on larger data bases of well documented patient information to guide the selection of future therapies for PCD treatments. It is also clear that the management of patients within the complex of diseases that comprise PCD should be performed in centers with expertise in the imaging, medical, interventional and surgical approaches to diseases of the PCD.

Indexed as

Posterior circulationstrokevertebral basilar insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID29930872
PMCPMC5991286
OpenAlexW2804192341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.