ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2018
Bruxism- is botulinum toxin an effective treatment?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Effects of different interventions on bruxism: an overview of systematic reviews.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Review
- Sleep Bruxism in Children: A Narrative Review.Current pediatric reviews · 2024Review
- Consecutive Controlled Case Series on Effectiveness of Opipramol in Severe Sleep Bruxism Management-Preliminary Study on New Therapeutic Path.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Fractures of implant fixtures: a retroscccpective clinical study.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
- Article
- The Evaluation of the Relationship between Changes in Masseter Muscle Thickness and Tooth Clenching Habits of Bruxism Patients Treated with Botulinum Toxin A.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data sourcesPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Scielo and Lilacs databases were searched from 1980 to March 2016. Literature reviews were explored in order to retrieve any other relevant papers.Study selectionRandomised controlled studies (RCTs), prospective and before and after studies that applied botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) to the masseter and/or temporalis muscles assessing objective and subjective parameters of bruxism published in English were included.Data extraction and synthesisThree reviewers independently assessed for eligibility. Disagreement was solved by discussion and when reaching consensus between at least two. Standard data items were extracted. Quality assessment was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool. Before-After Study Checklist was used for the nonrandomised studies. Results were presented as a narrative review.ResultsFive studies were included in the review, of those three were RCTs and two before and after. A total of 188 subjects were included. Regimen was unique in each study and the follow-up ranged from two to 24 weeks. The risk of bias of the RCTs was assessed as low to unclear, while the before and after studies were assessed as of moderate risk of bias.ConclusionsThe authors concluded that botulinum toxin represents a possible option for the management of sleep bruxism (SB), minimising symptoms and reducing the intensity of contractions rather than for SB itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.