Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29930359›Full record

SynthesisEvidence-based dentistry2018

Systematic review finds that silver diamine fluoride is effective for both root caries prevention and arrest in older adults.

David McReynolds, Brett Duane

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Evidence-based dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07194629 (Impact of Silver Diamine Fluoride), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07194629 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) 38% Application on the Oral Health of the Elderly With Loss of Autonomy Living in Long-term Care Homes (CHSLDs): A Pilot and Feasibility Effectiveness Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de MontréalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsDental Caries, Elderly, Loss of Autonomy, Silver Diamine FluorideArmsSilver diamine Fluoride 38%, placebo solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David McReynoldsDublin Dental University Hospital, Ireland.
Brett DuaneDublin Dental University Hospital, Ireland.
Dublin Dental University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sourcesPubMed, Pubmed Clinical Queries, EMBASE, the American Dental Associations Evidence-Based Dentistry Website, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, repository of the Journal of the American Dental Association and Google Scholar.Study selectionFour authors independently assessed the abstracts of studies resulting from the above searches which compared treatment of root caries in an older population with SDF versus other preventive agents or placebos.Data extraction and synthesisTitles and abstracts of all reports identified through the electronic searches were assessed independently by four authors based on agreed upon inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the selected studies for final inclusion in the systematic review, study quality was assessed using the critical appraisal worksheet for randomised controlled trials from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM 2005). Prevented fraction (PF), number needed to treat (NNT) and relative risk (RR) were calculated as outcome measures in each study. In addition, the published evidence on SDF was reviewed in order to formulate clinical recommendations on safety and effectiveness when treating root or coronal caries in an adult population with SDF, as well as treatment of dental hypersensitivity.ResultsThree randomised controlled trials were identified that addressed the effectiveness of SDF on root caries in older adults, but none addressed coronal caries. Root caries prevented fraction and arrest rate for SDF were significantly higher than placebo. The prevented fraction for caries prevention for SDF compared to placebo was 71% in a three-year study and 25% in a two-year study. The prevented fraction for caries arrest for SDF was 725% greater in a 24-month study and 100% greater than placebo in a 30-month study. No severe adverse effects were observed.ConclusionsExisting reports of SDF trials support effectiveness in root caries prevention and arrest, remineralisation of deep occlusal lesions and treatment of hypersensitive dentine.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCariostatic AgentsDental CariesFemaleFluorides, TopicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsRoot CariesSilver CompoundsCariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver Compoundssilver diamine fluoride

Identifiers

PMID29930359
OpenAlexW2809679380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.