Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29930219›Full record

ArticleAging2018

Naked mole rat cells display more efficient excision repair than mouse cells.

Alexei Evdokimov, Mikhail Kutuzov, Irina Petruseva, Natalia Lukjanchikova, Elena Kashina, Ekaterina Kolova, Tatyana Zemerova, Svetlana Romanenko, Polina Perelman, Dmitry Prokopov and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Eusocial reproduction selects for longevity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. DNA repair and anti-cancer mechanisms in the long-lived bowhead whale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The landscape of aging.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexei Evdokimov *Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Mikhail Kutuzov *Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Irina PetrusevaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Natalia LukjanchikovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Elena KashinaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Ekaterina KolovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Tatyana ZemerovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Svetlana RomanenkoInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Polina PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Dmitry ProkopovInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Andrei SeluanovDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Vera GorbunovaDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Alexander GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Vladimir TrifonovInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Svetlana KhodyrevaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Olga LavrikInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RUInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RUUniversity of Rochester · USInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RU

Funding

The role of hyaluronan in longevity and cancer resistance of longest-lived rodentP01AG047200 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Andrei Seluanov · 2014 to 2026
$36.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG047200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naked mole rat (NMR) is the long-lived and tumor-resistant rodent. NMRs possess multiple adaptations that may contribute to longevity and cancer-resistance. However, whether NMRs have more efficient DNA repair have not been directly tested. Here we compared base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) systems in extracts from NMR and mouse fibroblasts after UVC irradiation. Transcript levels of the key repair enzymes demonstrated in most cases higher inducibility in the mouse vs the NMR cells. Ratios of repair enzymes activities in the extracts somewhat varied depending on post-irradiation time. NMR cell extracts were 2-3-fold more efficient at removing the bulky lesions, 1.5-3-fold more efficient at removing uracil, and about 1.4-fold more efficient at cleaving the AP-site than the mouse cells, while DNA polymerase activities being as a whole higher in the mouse demonstrate different patterns of product distribution. The level of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis was 1.4-1.8-fold higher in the NMR cells. Furthermore, NMR cell extracts displayed higher binding of PARP1 to DNA probes containing apurinic/apyrimidinic site or photo-reactive DNA lesions. Cumulatively, our results suggest that the NMR has more efficient excision repair systems than the mouse, which may contribute to longevity and cancer resistance of this species.

Indexed as

Mole RatsUltraviolet RaysAnimalsDNADNA RepairFibroblastsGene Expression RegulationMiceRNA, MessengerSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsDNARNA, Messengerbase excision repairHeterochephalus glaberMus musculusnucleotide excision repairpoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1

Identifiers

PMID29930219
PMCPMC6046242
OpenAlexW2809637858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.