Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29930096›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Morphology-Specific Discrimination between MS White Matter Lesions and Benign White Matter Hyperintensities Using Ultra-High-Field MRI.

Z Hosseini, J Matusinec, D A Rudko, J Liu, B Y M Kwan, F Salehi, M Sharma, M Kremenchutzky, R S Menon, M Drangova

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Central Vein Sign in Radiologically Isolated Syndrome.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Z HosseiniFrom the Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program (Z.H., R.S.M., M.D.).ORCID 0000-0003-2674-967X
J MatusinecDepartments of Medicine (J.M.).ORCID 0000-0001-7370-375X
D A RudkoDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery (D.A.R.), McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-1299-954X
J LiuImaging Research Laboratories (Z.H., J.L., R.S.M., M.D.), Robarts Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-0802
B Y M KwanMedical Imaging (B.Y.M.K., F.S., M.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-1124-3206
F SalehiMedical Imaging (B.Y.M.K., F.S., M.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-5866-5377
M SharmaMedical Imaging (B.Y.M.K., F.S., M.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-0947-1282
M KremenchutzkyDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.S., M.K.), Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3079-3665
R S MenonFrom the Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program (Z.H., R.S.M., M.D.).ORCID 0000-0002-7916-0263
M DrangovaFrom the Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program (Z.H., R.S.M., M.D.) mdrangova@robarts.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-9038
Western University · CAImaging Center · USRobotics Research (United States) · USJisc · GBMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health Research 353372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecently published North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis guidelines call for derivation of a specific radiologic definition of MS WM lesions and mimics. The purpose of this study was to use SWI and magnetization-prepared FLAIR images for sensitive differentiation of MS from benign WM lesions using the morphologic characteristics of WM lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventeen patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 18 healthy control subjects were enrolled retrospectively. For each subject, FLAIR and multiecho gradient-echo images were acquired using 7T MR imaging. Optimized postprocessing was used to generate single-slice SWI of cerebral veins. SWI/FLAIR images were registered, and 3 trained readers performed lesion assessment. Morphology, location of lesions, and the time required for assessment were recorded. Analyses were performed on 3 different pools: 1) lesions of >3 mm, 2) nonconfluent lesions of >3 mm, and 3) nonconfluent lesions of >3 mm with no or a single central vein.

resultsThe SWI/FLAIR acquisition and processing protocol enabled effective assessment of central veins and hypointense rims in WM lesions. Assessment of nonconfluent lesions with ≥1 central vein enabled the most specific and sensitive differentiation of patients with MS from controls. A threshold of 67% perivenous WM lesions separated patients with MS from controls with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. Lesion assessment took an average of 12 minutes 10 seconds and 4 minutes 33 seconds for patients with MS and control subjects, respectively.

conclusionsNonconfluent lesions of >3 mm with ≥1 central vein were the most sensitive and specific differentiators between patients with MS and control subjects.

Indexed as

AdultCerebral VeinsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLeukoaraiosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID29930096
PMCPMC7410534
OpenAlexW2808813377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.