Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929962›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2018

Retina-specific loss of

Yumi Ueki, Veronika Shchepetkina, Frances Lefcort

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ELP1 gene augmentation restores visual function in a mouse model of familial dysautonomia.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Glaucomatous retinal ganglion cells: death and protection.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yumi UekiDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA yueki@montana.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2898-3267
Veronika ShchepetkinaDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0948-3689
Frances LefcortDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Montana State University · US

Funding

WHY DO MUTATIONS IN IKBKAP CAUSE FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA?R01NS086796 · NINDS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI LEFCORT, FRANCES · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Generation and Treatment of a Mouse Eye Model for Familial DysautonomiaR43EY025458 · NEI · AMERICAN GENE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL · PI LAHUSEN, JOHN TYLER · 2015 to 2015
$232k
NEI NIH HHS R43 EY025458NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familial dysautonomia (FD) is an autosomal recessive disorder marked by developmental and progressive neuropathies. It is caused by an intronic point-mutation in the

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCarrier ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalDysautonomia, FamilialIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane Potential, MitochondrialMice, KnockoutMitochondriaMitochondrial MembranesOrgan SpecificityRetinal DegenerationRetinal Ganglion CellsAdenosine TriphosphateCarrier ProteinsIkbkap protein, mouseIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsFamilial dysautonomiaIKAP/ELP1MitochondriaRetinal degenerationRetinal ganglion cells

Identifiers

PMID29929962
PMCPMC6078410
OpenAlexW2809068117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.