Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929874›Full record

SynthesisThe lancet. Psychiatry2018

Maternal and infant outcomes associated with lithium use in pregnancy: an international collaborative meta-analysis of six cohort studies.

Trine Munk-Olsen, Xiaoqin Liu, Alexander Viktorin, Hilary K Brown, Arianna Di Florio, Brian M D'Onofrio, Tara Gomes, Louise M Howard, Hind Khalifeh, Holly Krohn and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Depression Treatment in Pregnancy: Is It Safe, or Is It Not?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  12. Striking the Balance: Bipolar Disorder in the Perinatal Period.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Trine Munk-OlsenThe National Center for Register-based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: tmo@econ.au.dk.
Xiaoqin LiuThe National Center for Register-based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Alexander ViktorinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hilary K BrownInterdisciplinary Centre for Health and Society, Scarborough Campus, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arianna Di FlorioDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Brian M D'OnofrioDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Tara GomesLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Louise M HowardSection of Women's Mental Health/Women's Health Academic Centre, Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Hind KhalifehSection of Women's Mental Health/Women's Health Academic Centre, Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Holly KrohnDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Henrik LarssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paul LichtensteinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clare L TaylorSection of Women's Mental Health/Women's Health Academic Centre, Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Inge Van KampDepartment of Obstetrics, Section of Perinatal Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Richard WesselooDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Samantha Meltzer-BrodyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Simone N VigodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Veerle BerginkDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKing's College London · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Toronto · CAAarhus University · DKCardiff University · GBErasmus University Rotterdam · NLIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLLundbeck Foundation · DKWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Epidemiological and Genetic Predictors of Postpartum Mood DisordersR01MH104468 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MELTZER-BRODY, SAMANTHA ERIKA · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns about teratogenicity and maternal and offspring complications restrict the use of lithium during pregnancy for the treatment of mood disorders. We aimed to investigate the association between in-utero lithium exposure and risk of pregnancy complications, delivery outcomes, neonatal morbidity, and congenital malformations.

methodsIn this meta-analysis, primary data from pregnant women and their children from six international cohorts based in the community (Denmark, Sweden, and Ontario, Canada) and in clinics (the Netherlands, UK, and USA) were analysed. Pregnancies were eligible for analysis if the pregnancy resulted in a liveborn singleton between 1997 and 2015, if health-related information was available for both mother and infant, and if the mother had a mood disorder (bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder) or if she had been given lithium during pregnancy (at least two dispensations of lithium during pregnancy that were dispensed any time from 1 month before conception until the delivery, or a single lithium dispensation during pregnancy when there was at least one other lithium dispensation within 6 months before or after this date). Pregnancies during which the mother had been prescribed known teratogenic drugs were excluded. Pregnancies were grouped into a lithium-exposed group and a mood disorder reference group. The main outcome measures were pregnancy complications, delivery outcomes, neonatal readmission to hospital within 28 days of birth, and congenital malformations (major malformations and major cardiac malformations). Analyses were done at each site by use of a shared protocol. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were calculated by use of logistic regression models, and site-specific prevalence rates and ORs were pooled by use of random-effects meta-analytical models.

findings22   124 eligible pregnancies were identified across the six cohorts, of which 727 pregnancies were eligible for inclusion in the lithium-exposed group (557 [77%] from register-based cohorts and 170 [23%] from clinical cohorts). Lithium exposure was not associated with any of the predefined pregnancy complications or delivery outcomes. An increased risk for neonatal readmission within 28 days of birth was seen in the lithium-exposed group compared with the reference group (pooled prevalence 27·5% [95% CI 15·8-39·1] vs 14·3% [10·4-18·2]; pooled aOR 1·62, 95% CI 1·12-2·33). Lithium exposure during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of major malformations (pooled prevalence 7·4% [95% CI 4·0-10·7] vs 4·3% [3·7-4·8]; pooled aOR 1·71, 95% CI 1·07-2·72) but for major cardiac malformations the difference was not significant (2·1% [0·5-3·7] vs 1·6% [1·0-2·1]; pooled aOR 1·54, 95% CI 0·64-3·70).

interpretationConsidering both the effect sizes and the precision of the estimates in this meta-analysis, treatment decisions for pregnant women with mood disorders must weigh the potential for increased risks of lithium during pregnancy-in particular those associated with use of lithium during the first trimester-against its effectiveness at reducing relapse.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Global HealthAdultBipolar DisorderCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLithiumMajor Depressive DisorderOntarioPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsUnited StatesLithium

Identifiers

PMID29929874
PMCPMC6077091
OpenAlexW2807810323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.