Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929759›Full record

ArticleSurgery2018

Incidence and trends of cardiac complications in major abdominal surgery.

Yas Sanaiha, Yen-Yi Juo, Esteban Aguayo, Young-Ji Seo, Vishal Dobaria, Boback Ziaeian, Peyman Benharash

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Results of emergency colectomy in nonagenarians and octogenarians previously labeled as prohibitive surgical risk.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yas SanaihaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Yen-Yi JuoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Esteban AguayoDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Young-Ji SeoDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Vishal DobariaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Boback ZiaeianDepartment of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA.
Peyman BenharashDivision of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. Electronic address: Pbenharash@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17SDG33630113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiovascular complications are the leading cause of death after noncardiac surgery. Major abdominal operations represent the largest category of procedures considered to have an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. The current aim was to examine trends in the incidence of mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrest to determine the presence of potential volume-outcome relationships.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for patients undergoing elective, open abdominal esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, nephrectomy, hepatectomy, splenectomy, and colectomy (major abdominal surgery) during 2008-2014. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of operative volume on rates of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and mortality.

resultsOf the 962,754 elective admissions for major abdominal surgery, 1.4% experienced in-hospital mortality, 0.7% myocardial infarction, and 0.35% cardiac arrest. Myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest were associated with a 24-fold increase in risk of perioperative mortality. Compared with institutions that have a very low volume of operations, those hospitals with larger volumes of operations had a decreased risk of cardiac arrest and incident mortality after cardiovascular complications, but the odds of myocardial infarction were greatest at higher operative-volume hospitals. The annual all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction rates decreased over time, but the incidence of cardiac arrest increased.

conclusionMyocardial infarction or cardiac arrest after major abdominal surgery increased the odds of mortality with superior rescue after cardiovascular complications at higher volume institutions. Across all US hospitals performing major abdominal surgery, the rate of cardiac arrest increased without a concomitant increase in myocardial infarction or mortality. Novel targets for risk modification of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest as well as investigation of processes that facilitate rescue after these complications at higher operative-volume hospitals are needed to delineate quality improvement opportunities.

Indexed as

AgedDatabases, FactualDigestive System DiseasesDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHeart ArrestHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29929759
PMCPMC7652382
OpenAlexW2808894417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.