Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929526›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Factors affecting modern contraceptive use among fecund young women in Bangladesh: does couples' joint participation in household decision making matter?

Ahmed Zohirul Islam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed Zohirul IslamDepartment of Population Science and Human Resource Development, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh. zohirul.18@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-016X
University of Rajshahi · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of the study was to explore the association between couples' joint participation in household decision making and modern contraceptive use (MCU) among fecund (physically able to bear child) young women in Bangladesh.

methodsThis study utilized a cross-sectional data (n = 3507) extracted from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2011. Differences in the utilization of modern contraceptives (MC) by socio-demographic characteristics were assessed by χ

resultsDesire for a child after two years go by and no child at all contributed the most to increasing MCU followed by receiving family planning (FP) methods from FP workers. Couples' joint decision making power on women's health care, child's health care and visiting family members or relatives emerged as the third most influential factor that might be associated with MCU.

conclusionsSince spousal joint decision making increases the likelihood of using MC, government should include strategic interventions in FP programs to elevate women's status through creating educational and employment opportunities and encouraging more visible involvement in household decision making.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorDecision MakingAdolescentAdultBangladeshChildContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsContraceptive AgentsBDHSDecision making powerFamily planningModern contraceptiveswomen’s empowermentYoung women

Identifiers

PMID29929526
PMCPMC6013886
OpenAlexW2808888404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.