Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929512›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

What do you do with success? The science of scaling up a health systems strengthening intervention in Ghana.

James F Phillips, John Koku Awoonor-Williams, Ayaga A Bawah, Belinda Afriyie Nimako, Nicholas S Kanlisi, Mallory C Sheff, Patrick O Asuming, Pearl E Kyei, Adriana Biney, Elizabeth F Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James F PhillipsMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue B-2, New York, NY, 10032, USA. james.phillips@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6720-7204
John Koku Awoonor-WilliamsPolicy Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Ghana Health Service, Private Mailbag, Accra, Ghana.
Ayaga A BawahRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Belinda Afriyie NimakoPolicy Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Division, Ghana Health Service, Private Mailbag, Accra, Ghana.
Nicholas S KanlisiMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue B-2, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mallory C SheffMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Patrick O AsumingUniversity of Ghana School of Business, Legon, Ghana.
Pearl E KyeiRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Adriana BineyRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Elizabeth F JacksonMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 60 Haven Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Funding

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2016107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe completion of an implementation research project typically signals the end of research. In contrast, the Ghana Health Service has embraced a continuous process of evidence-based programming, wherein each research episode is followed by action and a new program of research that monitors and guides the utilization of lessons learned. This paper reviews the objectives and design of the most recent phase in this process, known as a National Program for Strengthening the Implementation of the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) Initiative in Ghana (CHPS+).

methodsA mixed method evaluation strategy has been launched involving: i) baseline and endline randomized sample surveys with 247 clusters dispersed in 14 districts of the Northern and Volta Regions to assess the difference in difference effect of stepped wedge differential cluster exposure to CHPS+ activities on childhood survival, ii) a monitoring system to assess the association of changes in service system readiness with CHPS+ interventions, and iii) a program of qualitative systems appraisal to gauge stakeholder perceptions of systems problems, reactions to interventions, and perceptions of change. Integrated survey and monitoring data will permit multi-level longitudinal models of impact; longitudinal QSA data will provide data on the implementation process. DISCUSSION: A process of exchanges, team interaction, and catalytic financing has accelerated the expansion of community-based primary health care in Ghana's Upper East Region (UER). Using two Northern and two Volta Region districts, the UER systems learning concept will be transferred to counterpart districts where a program of team-based peer training will be instituted. A mixed method research system will be used to assess the impact of this transfer of innovation in collaboration with national and regional program management. This arrangement will generate embedded science that optimizes prospects that results will contribute to national CHPS reform policies and action.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationCommunity Health PlanningCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based MedicineGhanaHealth Services ResearchHumansMedical AssistanceOrganizational InnovationPrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentQuality ImprovementChild survivalCommunity-based primary health careEmbedded scienceGhanaHealth policyHealth system strengtheningImplementation researchPlausibility trialResearch utilizationScaling up

Identifiers

PMID29929512
PMCPMC6013866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.