Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929475›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

A selective method for optimizing ensemble docking-based experiments on an InhA Fully-Flexible receptor model.

Renata De Paris, Christian Vahl Quevedo, Duncan D Ruiz, Furia Gargano, Osmar Norberto de Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Key Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renata De ParisBusiness Intelligence and Machine Learning Research Group-GPIN, School of Technology, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Building 32, Room 628, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Christian Vahl QuevedoBusiness Intelligence and Machine Learning Research Group-GPIN, School of Technology, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Building 32, Room 628, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Duncan D RuizBusiness Intelligence and Machine Learning Research Group-GPIN, School of Technology, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Building 32, Room 628, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. duncan.ruiz@pucrs.br.ORCID 0000-0002-4071-3246
Furia GarganoBioinformatics and Biossystems Modeling and Simulation Lab-LABIO, School of Technology, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Building 32, Room 602, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Osmar Norberto de SouzaBioinformatics and Biossystems Modeling and Simulation Lab-LABIO, School of Technology, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Building 32, Room 602, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the rational drug design process, an ensemble of conformations obtained from a molecular dynamics simulation plays a crucial role in docking experiments. Some studies have found that Fully-Flexible Receptor (FFR) models predict realistic binding energy accurately and improve scoring to enhance selectiveness. At the same time, methods have been proposed to reduce the high computational costs involved in considering the explicit flexibility of proteins in receptor-ligand docking. This study introduces a novel method to optimize ensemble docking-based experiments by reducing the size of an InhA FFR model at docking runtime and scaling docking workflow invocations on cloud virtual machines.

resultsFirst, in order to find the most affordable cost-benefit pool of virtual machines, we evaluated the performance of the docking workflow invocations in different configurations of Azure instances. Second, we validated the gains obtained by the proposed method based on the quality of the Reduced Fully-Flexible Receptor (RFFR) models produced using AutoDock4.2. The analyses show that the proposed method reduced the model size by approximately 50% while covering at least 86% of the best docking results from the 74 ligands tested. Third, we tested our novel method using AutoDock Vina, a different docking software, and showed the positive accuracy achieved in the resulting RFFR models. Finally, our results demonstrated that the method proposed optimized ensemble docking experiments and is applicable to different docking software. In addition, it detected new binding modes, which would be unreachable if employing only the rigid structure used to generate the InhA FFR model.

conclusionsOur results showed that the selective method is a valuable strategy for optimizing ensemble docking-based experiments using different docking software. The RFFR models produced by discarding non-promising snapshots from the original model are accurately shaped for a larger number of ligands, and the elapsed time spent in the ensemble docking experiments are considerably reduced.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMolecular Docking SimulationCloud computingFully-Flexible receptor modelMolecular dockingScientific workflow

Identifiers

PMID29929475
PMCPMC6013854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.