Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29929281›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2018

Conventional wastewater treatment and reuse site practices modify bacterial community structure but do not eliminate some opportunistic pathogens in reclaimed water.

Prachi Kulkarni, Nathan D Olson, Joseph N Paulson, Mihai Pop, Cynthia Maddox, Emma Claye, Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein, Manan Sharma, Shawn G Gibbs, Emmanuel F Mongodin and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Prachi KulkarniMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Nathan D OlsonUniversity of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, 8223 Paint Branch Drive, College Park, MD 20740, United States; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United States.
Joseph N PaulsonGenentech, Department of Biostatistics, Product Development, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080-4990, United States.
Mihai PopUniversity of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, 8223 Paint Branch Drive, College Park, MD 20740, United States.
Cynthia MaddoxInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine 801 West Baltimore St., BioPark II, 6th floor, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
Emma ClayeMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Rachel E Rosenberg GoldsteinMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Manan SharmaUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Environmental and Microbial Food Safety Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, BARC-East, Bldg. 201, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, United States.
Shawn G GibbsIndiana University Bloomington, School of Public Health 1025 E. 7th St, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Emmanuel F MongodinInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine 801 West Baltimore St., BioPark II, 6th floor, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
Amy R SapkotaMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health 4200 Valley Drive, College Park, MD 20742, United States. Electronic address: ars@umd.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USAgricultural Research Service · USIndiana University Bloomington · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS R03 OH009598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water recycling continues to expand across the United States, from areas that have access to advanced, potable-level treated reclaimed water, to those having access only to reclaimed water treated at conventional municipal wastewater treatment plants. This expansion makes it important to further characterize the microbial quality of these conventionally-treated water sources. Therefore, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize total bacterial communities present in differentially-treated wastewater and reclaimed water (n = 67 samples) from four U.S. wastewater treatment plants and one associated spray irrigation site conducting on-site ultraviolet treatment and open-air storage. The number of observed operational taxonomic units was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in effluent, compared to influent, after conventional treatment. Effluent community structure was influenced more by treatment method than by influent community structure. The abundance of Legionella spp. increased as treatment progressed in one treatment plant that performed chlorination and in another that seasonally chlorinated. Overall, the alpha-diversity of bacterial communities in reclaimed water decreased (p < 0.01) during wastewater treatment and spray irrigation site ultraviolet treatment (p < 0.01), but increased (p < 0.01) after open-air storage at the spray irrigation site. The abundance of Legionella spp. was higher at the sprinkler system pumphouse at the spray irrigation site than in the influent from the treatment plant supplying the site. Legionella pneumophila was detected in conventionally treated effluent samples and in samples collected after ultraviolet treatment at the spray irrigation site, while Legionella feeleii persisted throughout on-site treatment at the spray irrigation site, and, along with Mycobacterium gordonae, was also detected at the sprinkler system pumphouse at the spray irrigation site. These data could inform the development of future treatment technologies and reuse guidelines that address a broader assemblage of the bacterial community of reclaimed water, resulting in reuse practices that may be more protective of public health.

Indexed as

RecyclingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWaterWater MicrobiologyWater PurificationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewaterWater16S rRNA gene sequencingOpportunistic pathogensPublic healthReclaimed waterSpray irrigationWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID29929281
PMCPMC8290890
OpenAlexW2803903965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.