Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29928950›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2018

Contingency Training Alters Neurobiological Components of Emotional Resilience in Male and Female Rats.

M Kent, S Scott, S Lambert, E Kirk, B Terhune-Cotter, B Thompson, S Neal, B Dozier, M Bardi, K Lambert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M KentDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Concentration, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, United States.
S ScottDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
S LambertDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
E KirkDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
B Terhune-CotterDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
B ThompsonDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
S NealDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
B DozierDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
M BardiDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, United States.
K LambertDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Concentration, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, United States. Electronic address: klambert@richmond.edu.
Ashland (United States) · USRandolph–Macon College · USUniversity of Richmond · US

Funding

Phenotyping Resilience in Rodents: Targeting Key Neurobiological Responses in DeR15MH101698 · NIMH · RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE · PI LAMBERT, KELLY G · 2014 to 2014
$429k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH101698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research with a rat model of behavioral therapy [i.e., effort-based reward (EBR) contingency training] suggests that strengthened associations between physical effort and desired outcomes enhance neurobiological indices of resilience. In the current study, male and female Long-Evans rats were exposed to either six weeks of EBR training or noncontingent training prior to 10 days of exposure to chronic unpredictable stress (CUS). Subsequently, all animals were exposed to a problem-solving task and then trained in a spatial learning/foraging task, the Dry Land Maze (DLM). Following habituation training and test trials, rats were assessed in a probe trial that generated a prediction error (cognitive uncertainty). Results indicated that, during CUS exposure, contingency-training enhanced dehydroepiandrosterone/corticosterone ratios (consistent with healthier stress responses), especially in male rats. Additionally, contingency training increased exploratory behaviors in the probe trial as well as differentially influenced on-task problem-solving performance in males and females. Following the probe trial, brains were exposed to histological analyses to determine the effects of sex and contingency training on various neurobiological markers. Contingency training decreased BDNF-immunoreactivity (ir) in the hippocampus CA1 and lateral habenula, implicating differential neuroplasticity responses in the training groups. Further, coordinated fos-ir activation in areas associated with emotional resilience (i.e., motivation-regulation) was observed in contingent-trained animals. In sum, the current findings confirm that behavioral training is associated with neurobiological markers of emotional resilience; however, further assessments are necessary to more accurately determine the therapeutic potential for the EBR contingency training model.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAnimalsBehavior TherapyBrainCorticosteroneDehydroepiandrosteroneEmotionsExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansStress, PsychologicalCorticosteroneDehydroepiandrosteronebehavioral therapycontingencycopingresiliencespatial memorystress

Identifiers

PMID29928950
PMCPMC8112904
OpenAlexW2809281019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.