ArticleGastroenterology2018
Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy.
Article in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 276 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
Impact of Automatic Polyp Detection System on Adenoma Detection Rate-a Multicenter,Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study To Measure The Effect Of Use Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enabled Computer Aided Detection (CADe) Assistance Software In Detecting Colon Polyps During Standard Colonoscopy Procedures
Usefulness of GI-GENIUS in FIT-based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Randomized Controlled Trial.
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Trainee Adenoma Detection Rate
Randomized Clinical Trial of the Ultivision AI Artificial Intelligence System for Colorectal Cancer Screening or Surveillance in Colonoscopy
Who cites it
276 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 713 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of AI-assisted diagnosis on adenomas of different sizes: a meta-analysis with evidence from RCTs and trial sequential analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of malignant digestive tract tumors: focusing on opportunities and challenges in endoscopy and pathology.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- AGA Living Clinical Practice Guideline on Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy.Gastroenterology · 2025Guideline
- Artificial intelligence in endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis, 2004-2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting gastrointestinal luminal pathologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Visualizing knowledge evolution trends and research hotspots of artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Convolution neural network for the diagnosis of wireless capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- State of the Art: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy 2020.Current gastroenterology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Educating Outpatients for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy Using Conventional Methods vs Virtual Reality Videos Plus Conventional Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Impact of expert-curated video training data on computer-aided detection of sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective study in Korea.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- AI-driven drug design: a comprehensive review.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- AI-assisted endoscopic detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in atrophic gastritis: a multicenter diagnostic study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Machine learning and AI for cancer research and care: a review of applications, limitations, and future directions.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Optimised Deep Learning for Gastrointestinal Polyp Classification: A Controlled Benchmark of Five CNN and Transformer Architectures with Grad-CAM Interpretability.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThe benefit of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention depends on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The ADR should reflect the adenoma prevalence rate, which is estimated to be higher than 50% in the screening-age population. However, the ADR by colonoscopists varies from 7% to 53%. It is estimated that every 1% increase in ADR lowers the risk of interval colorectal cancers by 3%-6%. New strategies are needed to increase the ADR during colonoscopy. We tested the ability of computer-assisted image analysis using convolutional neural networks (CNNs; a deep learning model for image analysis) to improve polyp detection, a surrogate of ADR.
methodsWe designed and trained deep CNNs to detect polyps using a diverse and representative set of 8,641 hand-labeled images from screening colonoscopies collected from more than 2000 patients. We tested the models on 20 colonoscopy videos with a total duration of 5 hours. Expert colonoscopists were asked to identify all polyps in 9 de-identified colonoscopy videos, which were selected from archived video studies, with or without benefit of the CNN overlay. Their findings were compared with those of the CNN using CNN-assisted expert review as the reference.
resultsWhen tested on manually labeled images, the CNN identified polyps with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 and an accuracy of 96.4%. In the analysis of colonoscopy videos in which 28 polyps were removed, 4 expert reviewers identified 8 additional polyps without CNN assistance that had not been removed and identified an additional 17 polyps with CNN assistance (45 in total). All polyps removed and identified by expert review were detected by the CNN. The CNN had a false-positive rate of 7%.
conclusionIn a set of 8,641 colonoscopy images containing 4,088 unique polyps, the CNN identified polyps with a cross-validation accuracy of 96.4% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991. The CNN system detected and localized polyps well within real-time constraints using an ordinary desktop machine with a contemporary graphics processing unit. This system could increase the ADR and decrease interval colorectal cancers but requires validation in large multicenter trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.