Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29928897›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2018

Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy.

Gregor Urban, Priyam Tripathi, Talal Alkayali, Mohit Mittal, Farid Jalali, William Karnes, Pierre Baldi

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 276 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
35.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03761771 completednot on this map

Validating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy

TypeobservationalSponsorZhaoshen LiRan2018 to 2018Enrolled209ConditionsSensitivity of the ADS in Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy, Mean Number of Polyps Per Colonoscopy for Colonoscopists and Colonoscopists + ADSArmscolonoscopy withdrawal with the ADS monitoring
NCT03967756 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Automatic Polyp Detection System on Adenoma Detection Rate-a Multicenter,Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled1,118ConditionsColonic Polyps, Colorectal AdenomasArmsAutomatic polyp detection system
NCT04555135 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study To Measure The Effect Of Use Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enabled Computer Aided Detection (CADe) Assistance Software In Detecting Colon Polyps During Standard Colonoscopy Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorEndoVigilant IncRan2020 to 2021Enrolled769ConditionsColon Polyp, Colon Neoplasm, Colon AdenomaArmsEndoVigilant Software
NCT04673136 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Usefulness of GI-GENIUS in FIT-based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsociación Española de GastroenterologíaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled3,400ConditionsColorectal Neoplasms, Intestinal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Colonic PolypArmsGI-GENIUS Medtronic, Colonoscopy
NCT05423964 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Trainee Adenoma Detection Rate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsAdenoma, Adenoma Colon, Colorectal CancerArmsAI use in Endoscopy Room, Non-AI use Standard of Care endoscopy room
NCT05732233 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Ultivision AI Artificial Intelligence System for Colorectal Cancer Screening or Surveillance in Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSatisfai Health, Inc.Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled137ConditionsColon Adenoma, Polyp of Colon, Adenoma ColonArmsUltivision AI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 713 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. AI-driven drug design: a comprehensive review.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregor UrbanDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California; Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, University of California, Irvine, California.
Priyam TripathiDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California.
Talal AlkayaliDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California; H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, University of California, Irvine, California.
Mohit MittalDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California.
Farid JalaliDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California; H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, University of California, Irvine, California.
William KarnesDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California; H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, University of California, Irvine, California.
Pierre BaldiDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California; Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, University of California, Irvine, California; Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems, University of California, Irvine, California. Electronic address: pfbaldi@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Bioinformatics Tools for Circadian BiologyR01GM123558 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Pierre Baldi · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe benefit of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention depends on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The ADR should reflect the adenoma prevalence rate, which is estimated to be higher than 50% in the screening-age population. However, the ADR by colonoscopists varies from 7% to 53%. It is estimated that every 1% increase in ADR lowers the risk of interval colorectal cancers by 3%-6%. New strategies are needed to increase the ADR during colonoscopy. We tested the ability of computer-assisted image analysis using convolutional neural networks (CNNs; a deep learning model for image analysis) to improve polyp detection, a surrogate of ADR.

methodsWe designed and trained deep CNNs to detect polyps using a diverse and representative set of 8,641 hand-labeled images from screening colonoscopies collected from more than 2000 patients. We tested the models on 20 colonoscopy videos with a total duration of 5 hours. Expert colonoscopists were asked to identify all polyps in 9 de-identified colonoscopy videos, which were selected from archived video studies, with or without benefit of the CNN overlay. Their findings were compared with those of the CNN using CNN-assisted expert review as the reference.

resultsWhen tested on manually labeled images, the CNN identified polyps with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 and an accuracy of 96.4%. In the analysis of colonoscopy videos in which 28 polyps were removed, 4 expert reviewers identified 8 additional polyps without CNN assistance that had not been removed and identified an additional 17 polyps with CNN assistance (45 in total). All polyps removed and identified by expert review were detected by the CNN. The CNN had a false-positive rate of 7%.

conclusionIn a set of 8,641 colonoscopy images containing 4,088 unique polyps, the CNN identified polyps with a cross-validation accuracy of 96.4% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991. The CNN system detected and localized polyps well within real-time constraints using an ordinary desktop machine with a contemporary graphics processing unit. This system could increase the ADR and decrease interval colorectal cancers but requires validation in large multicenter trials.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdenomatous PolypsArea Under CurveColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEarly Detection of CancerFeasibility StudiesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsAdenoma Detection Rate Improving TechnologyColorectal Cancer PreventionConvolutional Neural NetworksMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID29928897
PMCPMC6174102
OpenAlexW2809596283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.