ReviewThe Journal of physiology2018
Antenatal prevention of cerebral palsy and childhood disability: is the impossible possible?
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Cerebral Palsy: Ischemia-Modified Albumin, Protein Carbonyl Compounds, AOPP, and Functional Status.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- Part II. Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025Review
- Review on Prevention of Cerebral Palsy from the Perspective of Social Pediatrics.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Midkine: The Who, What, Where, and When of a Promising Neurotrophic Therapy for Perinatal Brain Injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Waking up too early - the consequences of preterm birth on sleep development.The Journal of physiology · 2018Review
- Challenges and controversies in perinatal physiology.The Journal of physiology · 2018Article
- The fetus at the tipping point: modifying the outcome of fetal asphyxia.The Journal of physiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This review covers our current knowledge of the causes of perinatal brain injury leading to cerebral palsy-like outcomes, and argues that much of this brain damage is preventable. We review the experimental evidence that there are treatments that can be safely administered to women in late pregnancy that decrease the likelihood and extent of perinatal brain damage that occurs because of acute and severe hypoxia that arises during some births, and the additional impact of chronic fetal hypoxia, infection, inflammation, growth restriction and preterm birth. We discuss the types of interventions required to ameliorate or even prevent apoptotic and necrotic cell death, and the vulnerability of all the major cell types in the brain (neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, cerebral vasculature) to hypoxia/ischaemia, and whether a pan-protective treatment given to the mother before birth is a realistic prospect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.