ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2018
Long-term Phase 1/2 intraspinal stem cell transplantation outcomes in ALS.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transplantation of human neural progenitor cells secreting GDNF into the spinal cord of patients with ALS: a phase 1/2a trial.Nature medicine · 2022Trial
- The unfolded protein response in amyotrophic later sclerosis: results of a phase 2 trial.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Trial
- Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: an Original Study.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020Trial
- Regenerative strategies for ALS: stem cells and extracellular vesicles.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Long-term safety and clinical outcomes from a single-site phase 1 study of neural stem cell transplantation for chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Safety and efficacy evaluation of intracerebroventricular human neural stem cell transplantation in SOD1 mice as a novel approach for ALS.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Viral and non-viral cellular therapies for neurodegeneration.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Cell therapy for neurological disorders.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Human neural stem cells derived from fetal human brain communicate with each other and rescue ischemic neuronal cells through tunneling nanotubes.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical results of neurorestorative cell therapies and therapeutic indications according to cellular bio-proprieties.Regenerative therapy · 2023Review
- Stem Cell Therapy, the Market, the Opportunities and the Threat.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2023Review
- Human Neural Stem Cell-Based Drug Product: Clinical and Nonclinical Characterization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Stem cell therapy for central nervous system disorders: Metabolic interactions between transplanted cells and local microenvironments.Neurobiology of disease · 2022Review
- Monoclonal antibody-mediated immunosuppression enables long-term survival of transplanted human neural stem cells in mouse brain.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022Article
- Potential of Cellular Therapy for ALS: Current Strategies and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- All Roads Lead to Rome: Different Molecular Players Converge to Common Toxic Pathways in Neurodegeneration.Cells · 2021Review
- Interplay between immunity and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Clinical impact.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- GLT1 gene delivery based on bone marrow-derived cells ameliorates motor function and survival in a mouse model of ALS.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntraspinal human spinal cord-derived neural stem cell (HSSC) transplantation is a potential therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, previous trials lack controls. This post hoc analysis compared ambulatory limb-onset ALS participants in Phase 1 and 2 (Ph1/2) open-label intraspinal HSSC transplantation studies up to 3 years after transplant to matched participants in Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) and ceftriaxone datasets to provide required analyses to inform future clinical trial designs.
methodsSurvival, ALSFRS-R, and a composite statistic (ALS/SURV) combining survival and ALS Functional Rating Scale revised (ALSFRS-R) functional status were assessed for matched participant subsets: PRO-ACT
resultsSurvival did not differ significantly between cohorts: Ph1/2 median survival 4.7 years, 95% CI (1.2, ∞) versus PRO-ACT 2.3 years (1.9, 2.5),
interpretationComparison of Ph1/2 studies to historical datasets revealed significantly improved survival and function using ALS/SURV versus PRO-ACT controls. While results are encouraging, comparison against historical populations demonstrate limitations in noncontrolled studies. These findings support continued evaluation of HSSC transplantation in ALS, support the benefit of control populations, and enable necessary power calculations to design a randomized, sham surgery-controlled efficacy study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.