Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29928493›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2018

Aptamers: novelty tools for cancer biology.

Ricardo L Pereira, Isis C Nascimento, Ana P Santos, Isabella E Y Ogusuku, Claudiana Lameu, Günter Mayer, Henning Ulrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic Potential of Aptamer-Protein Interactions.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022
    Review
  7. Antiproliferative Effects of the Aptamer d(GGGT)International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aptamer Applications in Emerging Viral Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Updates on Aptamer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ricardo L PereiraDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
Isis C NascimentoDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
Ana P SantosDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
Isabella E Y OgusukuDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
Claudiana LameuDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.
Günter MayerChemical Biology and Chemical Genetics, Life and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Henning UlrichDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the term 'cancer' was still over two thousand years away of being coined, the first known cases of the disease date back to about 3000BC, in ancient Egypt. Five thousand years later, still lacking a cure, it has become one of the leading causes of death, killing over half a dozen million people yearly. So far, monoclonal antibodies are the most successful immune-therapy tools when it comes to fighting cancer. The number of clinical trials that use them has been increasing steadily during the past few years, especially since the Food and Drug Administration greenlit the use of the first immune-checkpoint blockade antibodies. However, albeit successful, this approach does come with the cost of auto-inflammatory toxicity. Taking this into account, the development of new therapeutic reagents with low toxicity becomes evident, particularly ones acting in tandem with the tools currently at our disposal. Ever since its discovery in the early nineties, aptamer technology has been used for a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. With similar properties to those of monoclonal antibodies, such as high-specificity of recognition and high-affinity binding, and the advantages of being developed using

Indexed as

aptamerscancerCell-SELEXclinical application

Identifiers

PMID29928493
PMCPMC6003562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.