Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29928372›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Comparative analysis of the surgical treatment results for multiple myeloma bone disease of the spine and the long bone/soft tissue.

Jiangtao Shen, Xinru Du, Lingxiu Zhao, Hui Luo, Ziyu Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development and validation of a machine learning-based postoperative prognostic model for plasma cell neoplasia with spinal lesions as initial clinical manifestations: a single-center cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiangtao ShenDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101100, P.R. China.
Xinru DuDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, P.R. China.
Lingxiu ZhaoDepartment of Medical Information Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, P.R. China.
Hui LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, P.R. China.
Ziyu XuDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, P.R. China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNBeijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present retrospective study was designed to compare the pain relief, surgery duration, life quality, survival time and relative prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease patients with different surgical sites. A total of 65 cases were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group A included patients with lesions located in the spine, while Group B included patients with lesions located in the long bone or soft tissue. Pain relief was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), neurological impairment was determined according to Frankel classification, and survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was also used to estimate the effect of factors on the prediction of survival. The hospitalization time, preoperative duration of symptoms, method of surgery, complications, recurrence and survival time were evaluated and compared retrospectively. Pain relief and improvement of life quality were observed in all the patients in groups A and B. No significant differences were detected for the majority of parameters compared between groups A and B, with the exception of the surgery duration, as well as the postoperative VAS score at 1 and 6 months after surgery. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed several risk factors significantly associated with survival, including the preoperative VAS score, postoperative chemotherapy, prothrombin time activity (PTA), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase and urine protein level. In conclusion, surgical treatment was an effective therapeutic method in patients with MM. Postoperative analgesic use should be individualized according to the different surgical sites and postoperative periods. Furthermore, preoperative pain, PTA, albumin, urine protein level and postoperative chemotherapy are associated with prognosis.

Indexed as

comparative analysisdifferent surgical sitesmultiple myelomasurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID29928372
PMCPMC6004680
OpenAlexW2800047753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.