Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29928303›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2018

Harvesting changes mating behaviour in European lobster.

Tonje K Sørdalen, Kim T Halvorsen, Hugo B Harrison, Charlie D Ellis, Leif Asbjørn Vøllestad, Halvor Knutsen, Even Moland, Esben M Olsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tonje K SørdalenDepartment of Biology Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES) University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-9327
Kim T HalvorsenInstitute of Marine Research His Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6857-2492
Hugo B HarrisonAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Townsville QLD Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-0086
Charlie D EllisNational Lobster Hatchery Padstow UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9398-4579
Leif Asbjørn VøllestadDepartment of Biology Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES) University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9389-7982
Halvor KnutsenDepartment of Natural Sciences Centre for Coastal Research (CCR) University of Agder Kristiansand Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7627-7634
Even MolandDepartment of Natural Sciences Centre for Coastal Research (CCR) University of Agder Kristiansand Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6521-2659
Esben M OlsenDepartment of Natural Sciences Centre for Coastal Research (CCR) University of Agder Kristiansand Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3807-7524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Removing individuals from a wild population can affect the availability of prospective mates and the outcome of competitive interactions, with subsequent effects on mating patterns and sexual selection. Consequently, the rate of harvest-induced evolution is predicted to be strongly dependent on the strength and dynamics of sexual selection, yet there is limited empirical knowledge on the interplay between selective harvesting and the mating systems of exploited species. In this study, we used genetic parentage assignment to compare mating patterns of the highly valued and overexploited European lobster (

Indexed as

assortative matingHomarus gammarusmarine protected areasmating behaviourparentage analysissexual selection

Identifiers

PMID29928303
PMCPMC5999211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.