ArticleEvolutionary applications2018
Genomewide evidence of environmentally mediated secondary contact of European green crab (
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological Responses of the Green Shore Crab,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Review
- Adaptation to seasonal reproduction and environment-associated factors drive temporal and spatial differentiation in northwest Atlantic herring despite gene flow.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- The reconstruction of invasion histories with genomic data in light of differing levels of anthropogenic transport.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Population Structure, Genetic Connectivity, and Signatures of Local Adaptation of the Giant Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) throughout the Indo-Pacific Region.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Local environment-driven adaptive evolution in a marine invasive ascidian (Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Anthropogenic hybridization at sea: three evolutionary questions relevant to invasive species management.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Insights into the neutral and adaptive processes shaping the spatial distribution of genomic variation in the economically important Moroccan locust (Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Twin introductions by independent invader mussel lineages are both associated with recent admixture with a native congener in Australia.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Fine-scale temperature-associated genetic structure between inshore and offshore populations of sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus).Heredity · 2019Article
- Temporal dynamics of genetic clines of invasive European green crab (Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
- Population genomics of the introduced and cultivated Pacific kelpEvolutionary applications · 2018Article
- Analysis of Genome-Wide Differentiation between Native and Introduced Populations of the Cupped Oysters Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea angulata.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Genomewide evidence of environmentally mediated secondary contact of European green crab (Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic-environment associations are increasingly revealed through population genomic data and can occur through a number of processes, including secondary contact, divergent natural selection, or isolation by distance. Here, we investigate the influence of the environment, including seasonal temperature and salinity, on the population structure of the invasive European green crab (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.