SynthesisPloS one2018
Management of tuberculosis by healthcare practitioners in Pakistan: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-sectional analysis of tuberculosis burden and risk factors in Swabi district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2025Article
- The rising tide of tuberculosis in Pakistan: Factors, impact, and multi-faceted approaches for prevention and control.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Tuberculosis care provided by private practitioners in an urban setting in Indonesia: Findings from a standardized patient study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Personality and help-seeking for psychological distress: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Tuberculosis Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in Middle- and Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Journal of tropical medicine · 2023Review
- Understanding how geographic, demographic and treatment history impact health outcomes of patients with multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Pakistan, 2014-2017.Epidemiology and infection · 2020Article
- Closing gaps in the tuberculosis care cascade: an action-oriented research agenda.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the quality of tuberculosis (TB) care in Pakistan, through determining comparison of healthcare practitioners' knowledge and practices to national and international TB care guidelines.
methodsStudies reporting on knowledge, attitudes and practices of public and private practitioners with TB patients were selected through searching electronic databases and grey literature.
findingsOf 1458 reports, 20 full-texts were assessed, of which 11 met the eligibility and quality criteria; all studies focused on private sector care. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. In 3 of 4 studies, over 50% of practitioners correctly identified a cough as the main TB symptom. However, 4 out of 6 studies showed practitioners' compliance to be low (under 50%) for the use of sputum microscopy in diagnosis. The poorest quality care occurred in the later stages of treatment, with low compliance in prescribing practices for continuation-phase care and in monitoring and recording treatment progress, the latter of which is particularly critical for treatment success.
conclusionTB care was variable and generally inadequate, with both a lack of knowledge and a small 'know-do' gap evident-practitioners did not use methods that they know they should use. A lack of recent evidence found suggests that the quality of current practices may not be fully captured and further research is needed, especially on non-allopathic, rural and public-sector contexts. Improved training of practitioners, greater availability of recommended diagnostic tools and expansion of public-private partnerships are suggestions for improving the quality of TB care in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.