Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29928031›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Management of tuberculosis by healthcare practitioners in Pakistan: A systematic review.

Christy A Braham, Peter J White, Nimalan Arinaminpathy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Closing gaps in the tuberculosis care cascade: an action-oriented research agenda.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christy A BrahamMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis & Modelling, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4597-9991
Peter J WhiteMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis & Modelling, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nimalan ArinaminpathyMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis & Modelling, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the quality of tuberculosis (TB) care in Pakistan, through determining comparison of healthcare practitioners' knowledge and practices to national and international TB care guidelines.

methodsStudies reporting on knowledge, attitudes and practices of public and private practitioners with TB patients were selected through searching electronic databases and grey literature.

findingsOf 1458 reports, 20 full-texts were assessed, of which 11 met the eligibility and quality criteria; all studies focused on private sector care. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. In 3 of 4 studies, over 50% of practitioners correctly identified a cough as the main TB symptom. However, 4 out of 6 studies showed practitioners' compliance to be low (under 50%) for the use of sputum microscopy in diagnosis. The poorest quality care occurred in the later stages of treatment, with low compliance in prescribing practices for continuation-phase care and in monitoring and recording treatment progress, the latter of which is particularly critical for treatment success.

conclusionTB care was variable and generally inadequate, with both a lack of knowledge and a small 'know-do' gap evident-practitioners did not use methods that they know they should use. A lack of recent evidence found suggests that the quality of current practices may not be fully captured and further research is needed, especially on non-allopathic, rural and public-sector contexts. Improved training of practitioners, greater availability of recommended diagnostic tools and expansion of public-private partnerships are suggestions for improving the quality of TB care in Pakistan.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelAntitubercular AgentsCoughDose-Response Relationship, DrugHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternationalityOutcome Assessment, Health CarePakistanPractice Guidelines as TopicPublication BiasPublicationsReference StandardsSputumTuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID29928031
PMCPMC6013248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.