ArticlePLoS biology2018
Mice learn to avoid regret.
Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reward pursuit during a translational reward task correlates with anhedonia reductions following rTMS in patients with major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Naturalistic behavior and self-generated neural activity predictive of self-correction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deliberating on the role of dopamine.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Change-of-mind neuroeconomic decision-making is modulated by LINC00473 in medial prefrontal cortex in a sex-dependent manner.Science advances · 2025Article
- Neuroeconomically dissociable forms of mental accounting are altered in a mouse model of diabetes.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Impulsive Choices Emerge When the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Fails to Encode Deliberative Strategies.eNeuro · 2024Article
- A Double Hit of Social and Economic Stress in Mice Precipitates Changes in Decision-Making Strategies.Biological psychiatry · 2024Article
- Measuring excitation-inhibition balance through spectral components of local field potentials.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Differential processing of decision information in subregions of rodent medial prefrontal cortex.eLife · 2023Article
- Sunk cost sensitivity during change-of-mind decisions is informed by both the spent and remaining costs.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Distinct forms of regret linked to resilience versus susceptibility to stress are regulated by region-specific CREB function in mice.Science advances · 2022Article
- Computational validity: using computation to translate behaviours across species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Control over patch encounters changes foraging behavior.iScience · 2021Article
- Memory and decision making interact to shape the value of unchosen options.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Rethinking the role of taste processing in insular cortex and forebrain circuits.Current opinion in physiology · 2021Article
- What Behavioral Abilities Emerged at Key Milestones in Human Brain Evolution? 13 Hypotheses on the 600-Million-Year Phylogenetic History of Human Intelligence.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Vicarious Trial-and-Error Is Enhanced During Deliberation in Human Virtual Navigation in a Translational Foraging Task.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Regret can be defined as the subjective experience of recognizing that one has made a mistake and that a better alternative could have been selected. The experience of regret is thought to carry negative utility. This typically takes two distinct forms: augmenting immediate postregret valuations to make up for losses, and augmenting long-term changes in decision-making strategies to avoid future instances of regret altogether. While the short-term changes in valuation have been studied in human psychology, economics, neuroscience, and even recently in nonhuman-primate and rodent neurophysiology, the latter long-term process has received far less attention, with no reports of regret avoidance in nonhuman decision-making paradigms. We trained 31 mice in a novel variant of the Restaurant Row economic decision-making task, in which mice make decisions of whether to spend time from a limited budget to achieve food rewards of varying costs (delays). Importantly, we tested mice longitudinally for 70 consecutive days, during which the task provided their only source of food. Thus, decision strategies were interdependent across both trials and days. We separated principal commitment decisions from secondary reevaluation decisions across space and time and found evidence for regret-like behaviors following change-of-mind decisions that corrected prior economically disadvantageous choices. Immediately following change-of-mind events, subsequent decisions appeared to make up for lost effort by altering willingness to wait, decision speed, and pellet consumption speed, consistent with past reports of regret in rodents. As mice were exposed to an increasingly reward-scarce environment, we found they adapted and refined distinct economic decision-making strategies over the course of weeks to maximize reinforcement rate. However, we also found that even without changes in reinforcement rate, mice transitioned from an early strategy rooted in foraging to a strategy rooted in deliberation and planning that prevented future regret-inducing change-of-mind episodes from occurring. These data suggest that mice are learning to avoid future regret, independent of and separate from reinforcement rate maximization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.