Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29927661›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2019

Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.

Madelyn Welch, Thomas Ludden, Kathleen Mottus, Paul Bray, Lori Hendrickson, Jennifer Rees, Jacqueline Halladay, Hazel Tapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  2. Appropriate inhaler use in children with asthma: barriers and opportunities through the lens of the socio-ecological model.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madelyn Welcha Atrium Health, Department of Family Medicine Research , Charlotte , NC , USA.
Thomas Luddena Atrium Health, Department of Family Medicine Research , Charlotte , NC , USA.
Kathleen Mottusb University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Paul Brayc Vidant Medical Group , Greenville , NC , USA.
Lori Hendricksond Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.
Jennifer Reesb University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Jacqueline Halladaye Department of Family Medicine , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
Hazel Tappa Atrium Health, Department of Family Medicine Research , Charlotte , NC , USA.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePoor outcomes and health disparities related to asthma result in part from difficulty disseminating new evidence such as shared decision making (SDM) into clinical practice. As part of a three-arm cluster randomized dissemination study, evaluation of the impact of different dissemination methods was studied. Here we evaluate themes from patient and provider focus groups to assess the impact of a facilitated, traditional dissemination approach, or no intervention, on patient and provider perspectives of asthma care.

methodsUsing semi-structured questions, twenty-four pre- and post-intervention focus groups with patients and providers took place across primary care practices. Discussions were held in all three arms both before and after the time of intervention rollout. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed for themes.

resultsAcross all sites patients and providers discussed themes of communication, asthma self-management, barriers, education, and patient awareness. After the intervention, compared to traditional sites, facilitated practices were more likely to discuss themes related to SDM, such as patient-centered communication, patient-provider negotiation on treatment plan, planning, goal-setting, and solutions to barriers.

conclusionsEmergent themes allowed for further understanding of how the SDM implementation was perceived at the patient and provider level. The facilitated implementation was associated with higher adoption of the SDM intervention. These themes and supporting quotes add to knowledge of best practices associated with implementing an evidence-based SDM intervention for asthma into primary care and will inform researchers, practices, and providers as they work to improve adoption of evidence-based interventions into practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthDecision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareAsthmaHumansasthmaimplementationprimary carequalitative researchrandomized controlled trialShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID29927661
PMCPMC6515918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.